User talk:84.130.57.122

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

The page was deleted, by administrative consensus, because it was a vanity page. If it is restored after such a delete, it can be deleted on sight (speedy delete). This IP has also been reported for vandalism. Repeated recreation of a deleted page is vandalism. Zora 30 June 2005 10:46 (UTC)

QA- The page was set straight and neutral yesterday, yet you deleted it. I call that bias. If you insist on deleting this page then Ali Sina's must also be deleted and if i were you i would have deleted all of the mainstream Muslims hadith nonsense since that the root cause of trouble and i can prove it to you. Just look at this list of hadith which they call sahih(authentic): http://www.y19.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=109 http://www.y19.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=110 So please dont let yourself be fooled by those mainstream "Muslims". You are deleting the article of the wrong guys. It's a tragedy.

[edit] Votes for Undeletion

User:BrandonYusufToropov and I have recommended Edip Yuksel for undeletion. However, you are not helping the case by removing the speedy tag in violation of policy. If you want this article back, I suggest you knock it off. You are also welcome to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion, though you cannot vote unless you create an account and log in. All anonymous votes will be discounted by administrators as a matter of policy. --MikeJ9919 30 June 2005 19:18 (UTC)

[edit] UNDELETE CONDITIONS

Okay Edip/Khizar, here is the problem. Everytime someone replants the vfd again tag on the page, you remove it. I would be happy to nominate your article for undeletion, like Brandon did, on two conditions which comply with wikipedia policy:
  • You agree to stop removing the tag until a final decision is reached.
  • You stop making this an autobiography article where you self-promote yourself and start devoting large sections about other supporters. This article needs to be neutral.
I am sorry, but you have undeleted this article without any discussion 4 times now and if you continue I will have to report you. These are conditions that I am sure all other editors agree upon. I am happy that you have taken an interest in wikipedia, but still remember this is an encyclopedia and not a personal website. Thank you, Anonymous editor June 30, 2005 19:13 (UTC)

[edit] This is really no big deal

.... just need to pass the undelete measure I nominated and then follow procedure as we rework the article. (You should realize, though, that people who disagree with the article have the right at any time to make changes to it! That's in the nature of WP).

Hope you will log in with a username (of any level of anonymity you like, or no level of anonymity) and vote to keep the article Edip Yuksel at Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion, so we can get started. You should be contributing here, not just on this article, but in any number of areas. The rules are not that hard to learn, I promise. BrandonYusufToropov 30 June 2005 19:50 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../8/4/2E/User_talk%7E84.130.57.122.html"