User talk:83.131.51.211

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] RE: Encyclopedia

Hello; thanks for your note. The facts aren't in dispute, but their placement within the article is. There's much more to the topic of encyclopedias than the origin of Mr. Skalić ... all of which can be addressed through notes per the current version. Thank you for your co-operation. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 21:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Your arguments seem to glaze over other arguments and citations to the contrary. I am not questioning their validity, but I do challenge your approach: we are trying to treat and incorporate all available information equitably, and you created the controversy by editing or reverting without commentary. Arguably, this information doesn't even belong in this article but just in that of Mr. Skalić. Please brush up on Wp norms of behaviour.
Please use better discretion in your edits and commentaries: other editors (and well established ones) may be less receptive to dealing with said content and particularly those from an otherwise anonymous editor (which are often stricken without debate). And to that end, you might considering registering for a username. Thanks. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 22:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


Agreed

Regards,

Rens

Great; thanks! E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 22:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
I believe the current version reads fine. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 22:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't think so- because it's made unnecessary controversion on which origin is Skalić! Skalić is nothing else than Croat- all oter things regardless from which sources they came are absourd, hence I have earlier pointed on all arguments - which are on a line of a pure common sense!

I'll revert to an older version! And it is nothing wrong me to do!

[edit] NPA

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Pilot|guy 22:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Please read and review WP:3RR, as you are getting close to violating it--a blockable offense.

Also, I highly encourage you to sign up with a username rather than making signficant and controversial changes from an IP address. --EngineerScotty 23:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Which "controversial changes" do you refer on!? Is that new name for the true facts on wikipedia, or is it seems to me like Wikipedia is becoming more and more authoritarian place!

  • Well, your edit is "controversial" in that several people disagree with it. Your definition of "authoritarian" seems to be "people object when I make unilateral changes to a page". The nationality of Paul Skalic isn't being questioned--at least not by me. What is being questioned is your practice of trying to put a detail that's already covered elsewhere in the article, and repeat it in an inappropriate manner. Plus, the tone of your contribution isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia.
I've no issue with giving Paul Skalic his due. But consensus, not you or I, determine what goes in and what goes out. Edit-warring is not allowed, and will get you blocked if you continue. --EngineerScotty 23:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../8/3/2E/User_talk%7E83.131.51.211.html"