User talk:75.73.8.206

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating edit wars.

Rumpelstiltskin223 01:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing sourced info.Bakaman 01:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
I have not violated the 3revertrule.Rumpelstiltskin223 01:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Plz see WP:Vandalism. Rumpelstiltskin223 01:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Please note WP:3RR. Blanking sourced info is vandalism. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 03:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

Please take racist statements like this [1] off-wikipedia. You are clearly a disruptive editor.

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating edit wars.

Rumpelstiltskin223 03:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Please keep racist trolling, ethnic generalizations and hateful statements in your blog. If you continue then I will request that action be taken against you. Rumpelstiltskin223 03:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
I don't have to answer to a clear-cut troll poster.Rumpelstiltskin223 04:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
What are you talking about?Rumpelstiltskin223 04:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning Removal

Your talk page is intended to serve as a place to discuss your contributions. It ends up being a sort of a history of the work you've done and the conflicts you've been in, or the praise you've received. It's alright to archive comments or warnings, but blanking your talk page is not considered acceptable, as it is not yours. Please read WP:USERPAGE and WP:TALK. Please instead contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, and please don't continue to blank other users' comments. -Kukini 07:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

The warnings given were unjustified to begin with. They accused me of "vandalism" when in truth I have explained my edits and put the discussion on the Talk Page. User:Rumpelstiltskin223 has also removed warnings. 75.73.8.206 07:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Because his warnings were nothing more than some sort of sophomoric retaliation to my legitimate warnings to this guy and his racist posts. Rumpelstiltskin223 08:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Legitimate? You gave me warnings on vandalism and I never vandalized in the first place. I warned you because of the illegal warnings. And what's so racist about my post? Notwithstanding your own racist comment on China.75.73.8.206 08:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
My comment was not on China (the country or the people or the Mongolian diaspora or whoever) but on the barbaric government of China. The government of China is a savage entity, worthy only of contempt. They know nothing but hate, greed, exploitation and destruction. They are not human beings. I have nothing but disgust for the government of China. I have no ill will on the people of China or anybody else. Once they justly overthrow their government and create a democratic system they will have a good government.Your comments were disparaging to my country and my people as a whole, not to a particular government or regime. Thus, your statements were inherently racist and mine weren't.Rumpelstiltskin223 09:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
I mentioned specific facts about your country and you dislike them and therefore called me a racist?? That's very pathetic of you. How's my comment being racist? Is it false or wrong accusations? I merely state the truth. Now, you just seem to prove that you are indeed a China-hater. You claimed to have "hated" only the government, but the fact is that your comments are also disparaging to the Chinese people as a whole. Why are Indians so critical of China? Because of their inferiority complex and they refused to admit it? Plus, you should be NPOV towards making edits (regardless of your "hatred"). Wikipedia is not a place where you can simply make edits to make the article looks like what you want it to be, while shutting out other's contribution and labelling it as vandalism as you have done to me. I expect higher civility from Indians like you. 75.73.8.206 09:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
You make racist remarks against Indians, calling them "facts", then try to accuse me of racism? That's a laugh. It is clear that I am wasting my time with a troll. Why do rabid Chinese ethnocentrists hate India? Because of their inferiority complex towards a country that gave them their religion, and the fact that Indians can actually speak English. Rumpelstiltskin223 11:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 31 hour block for 3RR

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. You might want to restrict yourself to 1 revert per day to avoid any problems in the future.

---J.S (T/C) 08:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

There are other users too that have violated this rule. I have explained my edits but they did not justify their reverts. 75.73.8.206 08:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "My edits on China as an emerging superpower were done with justifying reasons and I even managed to set up a discussion on the Talk Page of that article. Certain users such as Rumpelstiltskin223 have reverted my edits without giving any kind of reasons or discussing it in the Talk Page. He and others have accused me of Vandalism, and I have read what WP:Vandalism is all about. I do not believe my edits are vandalism of any sorts, and I have given all the reasons why I deleted certain statements (in the Talk Page of that article). Furthermore, that user himself is a violator of the 3-revert rule. I made edits that takes into account other user's changes, notable that of Nobleeagle and I think that under the 3-revert rule, it's not considered reverts so long as I made edits to improve the article or have given reasons for such an edit. As I said, I am already willing to discuss the changes I made in the Talk Page of that article, yet people keeps reverting my edits without reasons (so far nobody has replied to it). I think that this ban placed on me is unfair and should be withdrawn."

Decline reason: "3RR is 3RR. When you come back, try editing articles in a different area. - crz crztalk 19:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../7/5/2E/User_talk%7E75.73.8.206.html"