User talk:75.36.134.13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Vegetarianism

Your additions to the vegetarianism article were seen as unacceptable by an editor and reverted.

The editor reverted the change because they felt that you were using the article as a soapbox to advocate against vegetarian (something that wikipedia is not) and to advocate a point of view that is not neutral. Please don't do this in the future.

Here are some other useful links that might help you get up to speed on the policies and procedures for actions within Wikipeda:

Thanks! Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or are unsure about anything. —mako (talk•contribs) 05:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] restored edits

You removed the message that I placed on your talk page. In wikipedia, we try to keep this discussion on the page. You can read the Wikipedia talk page guidelines for more ideas of how to communicate on talk pages. If the information on your talk page gets out of date, you are encouraged to archive it. But please do not delete it so that other editors who want to communicate or follow up on an issue can see what was discussed. —mako (talk•contribs) 15:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] reverts

Thanks for your message on my talk page asking me about the other edits of yours that you reverted. In general I was concerned with the lack of citations or references on some of your edits which seemed suspect. I'll admit that your edits to the vegetarianism article were so outside what I believe is citable that I took a dim view of some of your other edits as well. In fact, I noticed that several other editors on articles had reverted other edits you made as well.

I'm sorry if I unfairly jumped to conclusions. Please accept my apology. If you want to reinclude this information, you should be sure to cite your sources and provide references for potentially controversial edits. For the record, I think that most of the edits that I found fall into this category. You can also read the Wikipedia guideline on citing sources. —mako (talk•contribs) 15:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. Things are definitely cool! If you plan on doing more editing on wikipedia, you might want to log in to do that. You can create an account in a just a second. This will allow you to create new articles and will make the new message banner go away after you check your messages. When you create an account, leave a message on my talk page and I can welcome you officially. Also, you should sign your talk page additions by putting ~~~~ at the end so I know who left the message. —mako (talk•contribs) 16:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Psychoactive Drug

I noticed that you made a bunch of edits to Psychoactive drug. Honestly, I don't like any of them. In fact, it seems that you changed the organization and titles almost exactly back to what they were a few months ago.

I don't want to start an edit war, but I think I should revert your edits, because the article was given Good Article status just before you edited it, and it was never given the same recognition a few months ago when it more resembled your current edit. You can look on the talk page for that article and discuss why the editors moved away from the organization you brought back. Jolb 15:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../7/5/2E/User_talk%7E75.36.134.13.html"