User talk:74.121.48.34

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

In response to your message on my talk page, note that Wikipedia is not the place to promote or advertise a product. Links should be to pages with additional information that is relevant and appropriate for the article, not merely to products related to the article. Please see WP:EL for further information on the appropriateness of external links. Thanks --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Intelligence quotient

Regarding your edits to Intelligence quotient (in these diffs: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] ), the link you've been adding has been removed because it is not a good fit for the article. Please see Wikipedia:External Links for more information about acceptable external links. If you still believe the link should be there, I'd recommend you discuss the matter on the article's talk page; continuing to add the link is considered external link spamming. -SpuriousQ 02:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Intelligence Quotient

Link Spam Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Intelligence Quotient, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your repeated insertions of a link to a nonsense page which apparently generates advertising revenue from hits is linkspam and you were warned yesterday to stop inserting it. Please stop inserting this link until you have achieved a consensus in talk to include it. Caper13 04:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I will not readd that link. You win. I was never trying to make money from the Google adsence, just see how it works and maybe recoupe hosting costs. My IQ test is more like a reseach project and I needed subjects :(.

But under the same logic, other external links don't belong there either. See the review papers section. This isn't following the standard "External Link" format and doesn't bring any value to the Acticle. I've contacted scientific American and waiting for thier response. One of those links are also in the "Notes" section. As a reference, I can't dispute that.

I noticed you again added your link ([7]). Please stop. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise for your research project. -SpuriousQ 07:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Do you know any other good places?
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../7/4/2E/User_talk%7E74.121.48.34.html"