Talk:72d Air Base Wing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 72d Air Base Wing article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force Related task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

[edit] Copyright

This page was listed as a copyvio as it is a verbatim copy of [1]. It IS a verbatim copy, but due to the websites terms it's not a copyvio.

The website's "disclaimer" states:

"...I don't have a "Copywrite Notice" [sic]. If someone sees something they like, they can have it." [2]

As such I think its fine for us to use it. I should draw attention to the disclaimer however. The author responds to accusations of plagarism in a very cavalier manner, "I don't take responsibility as to the content or any of the information on my site." Mark83 23:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Actually, the text on this website is a copy off of the Air Force Historical Research Agency (as given in External Links section of article). How very nice that the "author" is willing to take the credit, but doesn't take responsibility for plagarism from an official web site. NDCompuGeek 09:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)