User talk:71.82.118.77

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.

[edit] Your edit to SolidSnake4444

Your recent edit to SolidSnake4444 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 23:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

The joke is getting old. Humor's great, but Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia. It is time to straighten up and make serious contributions.

Shaun Eccles-Smith 23:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 14:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ryūlóng 21:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Tch, Colbert was right. You guys are just a fake encyclopedia. There's no higher learning to be gained here. You're all just trolls. Die in a fucking fire.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Yamla 23:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Lonelygirl15, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BigCow 21:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Hunami

Look, I am a Colbert fan too, and there is a place on Wikipedia for his neologisms (List_of_neologisms_on_The_Colbert_Report, for example), but they do not deserve their own articles. If we want to keep Wikipedia as a valid source of information, we can't have poor quality, unimportant articles like "hunami" (have you actually heard the word used outside of the Report?). -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 02:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)