User talk:71.235.238.180

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 71.235.238.180, is registered to Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. and may be shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

However, you might still be unable to edit Wikipedia if the IP you are using is blocked due to a MediaWiki "feature". In such a case you could request to be unblocked.

In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. to report network abuse.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Talk:University of Michigan, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 02:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to A Scanner Darkly (film)

Your recent edit to A Scanner Darkly (film) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit on Civilization 4

I was not the person who reverted your change, but whoever did, was right to do so. I understand where you are coming from with your arguement, but critics' scores are relevant to an article. It gives the reader an understanding of what critics thought of the quality of the game. If you look at almost any other article about a popular game (The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion and Battlefield 2 for example) you will find a section that contains critical reception data. Just wanted to let you know what you did wrong :-)Imaninjapirate 04:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)