User talk:71.146.158.221

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
NOTE: A contributor at this anonymous IP address, that signs themselves "ELV" is persistently engaged in making numerous dubious, POV or vandalistic additions shrouded as factual to historical articles in a manner that would fool someone who is not knowledgeable on the topic, and has not responded to the requests to stop on their talk page. See User_talk:71.146.133.208 for other IPs from which this editor has contributed, showing a persistent pattern across many months.

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during August 4, 2006 (UTC) to Battle of France

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 08:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] French-Thai War

You are yet again making up history and altering articles. You were already warned about this here [1]. This is vandalism. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gsd2000 12:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Talk:11 March 2004 Madrid train bombings

Randroide 12:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC) You wrote: Because, let's face it, barring a few outlandish conspiracy theorists who still think that the Battle of Waterloo never happened if "Professor X" says it did not, it should be obvious that it was perpetrated by Radicalized Muslim Terrorists. [2]

I am one of those people you call a few outlandish conspiracy theorists.

  • We are not "few". We follow the investigations made by the second spanish newspaper: El Mundo (Spain).
  • We are not "conspiracy theorists" and we are not "outlandish", and some users can feel offended if you persist in using that kind of language. Please read read this: WP:NPA.
  • it should be obvious it is NOT a proper source. I suggest you to read WP:CITE and WP:VERIFY. I linked (see article and talk page) hard as nails proper sources showing that the Radicalized Muslim Terrorists autorship is not obvious at all.

By administrative order, changes must be discussed first in that page. Read carefully the archives of the talk page and you will avoid gross mistakes in that page in the future.

[edit] Korean War

For the umpteenth time, you have made alterations to long-standing casualty figures [3] with absolutely no explanation on the talk page, and a checking of the facts reveals that you are adding nonsense.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gsd2000 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

And again you have done it [4]. I am now reporting you. Gsd2000 13:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Austro-Prussian War

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 13:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Continuation of Conversation

You replied to me on Talk:Mukden Incident: "I have made mistakes, I admit it, and I have apoligized via e-mail. Also, you claim that "all" of my edits have been reversed. Take a look at Oskar Potiorek. At The Balkan front of WWI. On the Battle of Vittorio in Italy. Note to Gsd2000, not double checking things makes you look inept (I should know, I have sometimes been the victum of such things as haste) but spreading info you KNOW is false makes you look like a (censored by user.) Also, I would LOVE to know about my abuses on THIS topic. Can you cite any? I would honestly love to hear back from you. Take your time. ELV"

Before contributing any further to Wikipedia, you need to understand a few things:

  • When people write on your talk page and question something you have written, it is polite to reply on your or their talk page with an answer. I have repeatedly asked you why you are changing certain things, and you never reply.
  • When you write something on a talk page, instead of signing it "ELV", you should end with four tildes, ~~~~, which then get expanded to your ID and the date when you save.
  • You say "I have made mistakes, I admit it". Frankly, the "mistakes" you have made are inexcusable. If by your own admission, you haven't checked your facts, you shouldn't be changing Wikipedia. It's as simple as that.
  • No more changing casualty figures without explanations on talk pages. If you do, I'll report you for vandalism again, and you will be permanently blocked. You have already been blocked twice.

Also if you care to look at the history of the Battle of Vittorio [[5]], you'll see your edits were reverted by a user with the comment "Remove bull". Bull is, frankly, a very apt word to describe the vast majority of your contributions.

Gsd2000 14:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../7/1/2E/User_talk%7E71.146.158.221.html"