User talk:70.121.7.89

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user talk page has been protected from editing by new or unregistered users to prevent 70.121.7.89 (talk • contribs • block logauto) from introducing vandalism to it. (Administrators, please remember to add the user to Wikipedia:List of protected pages#Protected user pages.)

Contents

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made inappropriate edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, please do not do it again. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help see:

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using three tildes (~~~), or four (~~~~) if you want a timestamp; this will automatically produce your name and the timestamp if requested. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to GNU/Linux naming controversy

Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. riana_dzasta 03:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User:Cimon Avaro, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -NorsemanII 13:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


XYY syndrome

Please don't discuss the contents of an article in the article itself. That should be done on the article's Talk page. Ward3001 03:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


Repeated vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to XYY syndrome, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 03:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I am NOT vandalizing anything jackass, read the fucking talk page. It is badly worded, and incorrect in direct relation to the article itself. You owe me a fucking apology you pompous boob.

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 03:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Please ASSUME GOOD FAITH and you won't get attacked. In this case you deserve it for you handling of my criticisms of the article.

More vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to XYY syndrome, you will be blocked from editing. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I had a legitimate criticism of the intro, which is discussed in the talk page. I DID NOT vandalize anything, only removed something that is sub-par to say the least. ASSUME GOOD FAITH.

Violation of 3-revert-rule

You are in violation of the 3-revert-rule (see WP:3RR. You are being reported to a Wikipedia administrator. Ward3001 03:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

You did NOT assume good faith, you are being reported to an administrator as well.
You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by the Wikipedia:Three Revert Rule. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "Admin abuse in light of a legitimate problem with an article"

Decline reason: "Allegation unfounded. Blocking administrator (Borisblue) blocked you for violating WP:3RR first and only THEN reverted your edit on procedural grounds. He was not involved with the ongoing dispute at XYY syndrome. Block upheld since you ignored the 3RR warnings which applies to ALL editors. --  Netsnipe  ►  04:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Asperger's syndrome

Regarding your message about this article: I haven't the slightest idea what you are talking about. --DanielCD 12:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree with DanielCD. You seemed to have only added that comment on the talk page to get a response. This is called trolling and is frowned upon on Wikipedia. Doc Strange 13:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Please see WP:NPA. One more time and you will be blocked. Cheers! Postoak 05:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

VegaDark 06:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "Everything I said was true, should I add a section requesting citations? Having time to edit user's talk pages makes you a pathetic loser. Like you are. And Postoak is. And in general, the rest of the loser ass Wikipedia community. So, do I need citations for that FACT?"

Decline reason: "Cut the trolling -- when you're in a hole, which you obviously are, it's time to stop digging before your block is extended. Even a cursory glance at your contribs shows this block is apparently valid. You'll need a better explanation if you hope to convince me, at least. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Block reset and extended

This is unacceptable. Each time you tamper with posts made by any administrator will result in your block being reset by another week. --  Netsnipe  ►  11:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

  • As you were promised, I am now blocking you for 2 weeks and protecting your talk page to prevent more attacks. - Mike Rosoft 15:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../7/0/2E/User_talk%7E70.121.7.89.html"