User talk:69.41.40.21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Fringeworthy

Stop adding that information in without a citation to a reliable source. It doesn't matter who you are or who you claim to be, that is not verifiable and no reader can check to make sure you are who you say you are. Either way though it doesn't matter because unless this is cited to a source it cannot be int he article. Konman72 15:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

You have done it yet again despite my warnings. It doesn't matter who you claim to be, or even who you are, information on Wikipedia must be verifiable, and by that I mean you need a citation to a reliable source. I don't care if you are the creator or not, that is not verifiable by me or any of the readers. If you add it back in one more time without citation it will be considered vandalism and I will be forced to report you. Please read my warnings and take them to heart, I do not wish to cause any trouble, but your behavior here has already crossed into vandalism territory and I hope you can not take it any further. Konman72 00:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
P.S. In your last edit summary you state that it is being "added by the creator, not an outside source". Realize that that actually gives me even more reason to delete it. If it was from an outside source it would be more reliable as a source and have a more neutral point of view about it. You on the other hand, if you actually are who you claim to be, have no credibility as a source beyond your word, which is not enough to put information in an encyclopedia article. Konman72 00:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I am most certainly bias as are all human beings, but I am trying to remain objective and have given you many examples of blatant policy violations in what you are doing. Nowhere has bias factored into my edits, nor could it as I have merely deleted passages that blatantly violate Wikipedia policy and common-sense. I am not censoring you, I am making you follow the rules and regulations that support this community. If you find a citation to a reliable source as I have said then I will go away forever because I will have no recourse against you, nor will I want any. You will hopefully notice that nowhere in our correspondence have I tried to claim that you are wrong in what you are saying. It is not my place to disprove you. What I do want though is proof that what you are saying is true, and by this I do not mean that I want you to prove theft, but you must prove that a lawsuit was brought and then give any pertinent facts, such as the ensuing loss that seems to have occurred. Once proof is provided then it is verifiable and is perfectly welcome here, even by me. Konman72 09:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
P.S. I actually am not as bias as you may think. I have a certain distaste for the film; my appreciation for Stargate is limited to the series and the series only. Konman72 09:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)