User talk:69.208.199.103

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

you guys are just biased. are you afraid to talk to me?

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -Will Beback 22:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] progressivism

Regarding your personal commentary on a Wiki page, I am a bit dumbfounded. What is your point? Because I choose to edit a particular page, so therefore my political views must coincide with it? You clearly have a hatred for any opposing perspective, but let me just say that the reason I reverted your edit was not to defend social welfare, but to point out that the category refers to more than just the welfare aspect, it refers to something progressives call social justice, which is more broad. Please understand this is not about you or your beliefs, nor mine, but about contributing constructively to an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jackbirdsong 22:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

You have legitimized yourself by responding. We can now have a debate. I do not have a "hatred for any opposing perspective". Such a claim is riduclous. Helping people in society is called "social welfare". People receiving welfare should feel grateful for the help. But the way the left gets votes is not by people feeling grateful. It is by making them feel hateful. The left wants poor people to hate and envy the wealthy. So they changed the language to "social justice". As if the wealthy are guilty of a crime for being rich and justice must punish them.

"social justice" is a loaded term invented by the left to pander to stupid people to get their votes. It is not a legitamate part of the english language and has no place in an encyclopedia.

Maybe we should use in wikipedia some of the vague loaded terms the right has invented like "family vaules" "war on terror" "weapons of mass destruction" "good man, good heart" "patriot act" "no child left behind"

These terms are meaningless gibberish. They belong in campaign propoganda. Not in an encyclopedia. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. __Seadog.M.S 23:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Social justice. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! -- lucasbfr talk 23:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's NPOV rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

User talk:69.208.199.103--Seadog.M.S 01:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

here is yet another POV edit


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -Will Beback 02:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/9/2E/User_talk%7E69.208.199.103.html"