User talk:69.136.96.119

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
To edit, please log in.

Due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network, editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address is currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please see here. We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
This user or user talk page has been temporarily protected from editing by new or unregistered users to prevent blocked users from removing warnings or introducing vandalism to it. (Administrators, please remember to add the user to Wikipedia:List of protected pages#Protected user pages.)
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 69.136.96.119). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 23:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Silly Love Songs on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Mets501 (talk) 02:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. – DAH-leck CABEX-TER-MIN-ATE 02:11, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Homestar Runner. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kalani [talk] 02:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Italian American on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 21:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Italian American, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Picaroon9288 22:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Italian American, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Bootstoots 22:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for removing your edit. - Bootstoots 22:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ford Motor Company, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 03:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Blocked

Unblock me, Pilotguy, please! I'm beggin' you!


You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Pilotguy (roger that) 03:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

No. You knew what you were doing is wrong. The 24-hour block stands. --Pilotguy (roger that) 04:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to John Kerry

Your change to the page John Kerry was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. ~Kylu (u|t) 04:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, we had to block you from editing so we can fix all the pages. While we encourage our editors to Be Bold, repeatedly inserting the same edits is a bit much. Please feel free to edit more constructively on Wikipedia once your block expires! Thanks. :) ~Kylu (u|t) 04:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

My edits to John Kerry and Paul Martin

My changes to the pages on John Kerry and Paul Martin were NOT VANDALISM. I removed the categories that listed both of them as Roman Catholics, because these two politicians support abortion rights which is treason against their faith (I am a devout Roman Catholic myself and I know that YOU CANNOT BE BOTH CATHOLIC AND PRO-ABORTION!!!

My sincerely held religious (and moral) beliefs

It is my duty as a Roman Catholic to declassify both John Kerry and Paul Martin as non-Catholics because they support abortion rights, which said faith TEACHES AGAINST. I have added valid contributions to Wikipedia, but I never will if you do not respect my changes to these two respective pages.

The standard of inclusion on Wikipedia is not truth, it's verifiability. If a million articles refer to Kerry and Martin as Roman Catholic and one makes the point that they're not, or one editor disagrees, verifiability requires that we continue to list them as Catholics. Please consider this policy before continuing your edits. If you decide that it's your duty to continue to violate policy, then honestly we may do better to simply part ways now and wish you happy editing elsewhere. ~Kylu (u|t) 04:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


Talk:Acme Market

2 things, please do not edit other people's comments and do not demand things or you will be blocked. --Caldorwards4 21:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

acme

acme is now part of supervalu inc. supervalu please don't remove the link thanks.--Micheal21 21:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


If you look at the albertsons website you would notice acme is not listed on there when supervalu bought albertsons all the division became part of supervalu inc how I know I work for albertsons.--Micheal21 01:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

You People have Problems

It's two things, not 2 things. I will demand things, and John Kerry is certainly not Catholic and nor is Paul Martin.

Note

Please note that you are blocked. Again. This time for what you did to the Planned Parenthood article. DS 03:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Fascism

Planned Parenthood is anti-Christian because Jesus was pro-life. The Bible disapproves abortion. Pardon me, but I did not know that an anti-Christian organization list does not exist.

I don't think it's funny, and I WILL NOT BE MOCKED. Planned Parenthood is anti-Christian. Feminists are sinners. Women were meant to submit to their husbands (so says the Bible.)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Costco, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TedTalk/Contributions 03:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Paul Martin

Please stop removing Paul Martin from the "Roman Catholic politicians" category. CJCurrie 03:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Must I continue making myself clear?

I removed him from that category for a reason. If he's PRO-ABORTION (I'm against using the word "choice" as a euphemism for abortion and birth control), he CANNOT BE A ROMAN CATHOLIC AT THE SAME TIME. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SAYS THAT YOU CANNOT BE BOTH CATHOLIC AND PRO-ABORTION. So I'm asking you nicely to STOP REVERTING MY EDITS ON THE PAUL MARTIN PAGE.

I wrote that Costco is "absolutely dispicable" for a reason

When I said Costco is "absolutely dispicable," I honestly meant it. Why? Because Costco does not allow their pharmacists to refuse to fill birth control prescriptions. Shame on the dirty company.

And someone else reverted it, as Wikipedia is not a place for political bias. Cheers! --Matt 23:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Advice from a Catholic administrator

Hello, I've been looking at some of your contributions and some of the messages on your talk page. Could I point out that what you're doing is not helpful either to Catholicism or to Wikipedia. What you're doing is borderline vandalism. What you insert into articles may, in some cases, be true, but you must know yourself that it's not appropriate for an encylopaedic article. If you break the three-revert rule, you'll be blocked; if you vandalize, you'll be blocked; if you're disruptive, you'll be blocked. Regarding your claim that you can't be a Catholic if you support abortion, that depends on the definition of Catholic. Support for abortion is certainly incompatible with Catholic belief, but Catholicism is sometimes used in the sense of the Church that you were brought up in and that you have not formally renounced. Think of it this way — the Catholic Church teaches that a Catholic who has not formally left the Church cannot be validly married in a Protestant Church or a registry office, unless he has received a special dispensation, but if a Catholic has left the Church, he can contract a valid marriage in another Church. If John is brought up Catholic, but leaves the Catholic Church and becomes a practising Methodist, and later marries a Methodist, that Methodist marriage is considered valid (assuming that neither he nor his wife is already married), because John, not being a Catholic, is not bound by Catholic marriage regulations. Now if John is brought up Catholic, starts to disagree with the Church about abortion and contraception when he's a teenager, sends donations to Planned Parenthood, goes to Mass once every couple of weeks, and then meets an Anglican girl, and marries her in the Anglican Church, without bothering to apply for a dispensation, his marriage, in the eyes of the Catholic Church, is nul and void, because he, as a Catholic (albeit a heretical, disobedient, lukewarm one) is bound by the marriage laws of the Catholic Church. So, by that argument, Kerry is in fact a Catholic, even though I share your low opinion of him.

It is possible for Catholics to do good here on Wikipedia, but only by staying within Wikipedia policies. If you make disruptive edits, they'll simply be reverted, and you'll be blocked. But the good we do here is not inserting a Catholic POV, but simply preventing an anti-Catholic POV from being inserted by others. We do this by staying within the rules, joining politely in the discussion on the talk pages, making reasonable arguments, keeping our tempers, and trying to achieve consensus. Difficult? Yes. Worth it? Definitely. AnnH ♫ 14:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Repeated religious vandalism by this user.

The following additional instances of religious vandalism have been reverted by other users, but are not reported previously on this page:

The following changes made by this user HAVE NOT BEEN REVERTED as of 01 Aug 06. Please justify them or revert them:

  • 19:10, 29 July 2006 AGAIN changed Jean Chrétien [5] Deleted Category:Roman Catholic politicians|Chretien, Jean

Additional malicious vandalism (not necessarily religious in nature)

  • 23:51, 22 July 2006 changed Bed inserted random links to articles about Retail stores an area in which this user apparently has considerable knowledge. (He has actually contributed a large number of constructive, yet trivial, edits to articles about a number of retailers) [6]

JimmB 20:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm keeping an eye on this account. There has been nothing at all for over 24 hours. AnnH ♫ 20:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Paul Martin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TedTalk/Contributions 00:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Pierre Trudeau, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. physicq210 00:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. physicq210 00:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not convinced

People, "pro-choice" (pro-abortion) politicians ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT ROMAN CATHOLIC. Also, gays, lesbians, and bisexuals cannot be either.

Unfortunately, Wikipedia is built on consensus and facts, not on one anonymous person's insistence. --physicq210 00:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Very funny. To you, not to me.

Who said I was being sarcastic? Look above this section; your warnings should tell you the story. --physicq210 00:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Sieg heil, fuhrer.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Jean Chrétien, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. physicq210 00:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Paul Martin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. physicq210 00:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't mess with me

I'm a pro-lifer! Stop reverting my edits or YOU WILL ALL BE BLOCKED.

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. --physicq210 00:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please remain civil

The pro-abortionists are uncivilized. I'm civilized. I don't want the unborn to be bloody murdered.

Nor do we.

Maybe

I hope you don't.

I don't what? Please explain.

Clarification

I meant I hope you don't support abortion rights (including birth control.)

My opinions are immaterial. But Wikipedia as a whole does not enjoy your endless editing that are pushing your POV (see WP:NPOV). We hence ask you to stop this unwarranted activity. Thank you.

Paul Martin

This is your last warning. If you don't stop vandalizing the Paul Martin page, you will be blocked. I understand you have strong beliefs about abortion, but this doesn't justify your disruption. CJCurrie 01:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Stupid oaf!

Disruption what, tough guy?

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. --physicq210 01:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism what?

And my edits ain't vandalism either!

André Boisclair

Hello, please do not edit André Boisclair entry. He is a dignified Catholic, and we should all be grateful that Wikipedia exists to indicate so. Pete Peters 01:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

You were warned

I've blocked you for 24 hours for repeated vandalism.

I recommend that you use the time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policy, especially Wikipedia:NPOV. CJCurrie 01:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. DVD+ R/W 02:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Italian American

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Italian American, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 21:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Planned Parenthood

Also, please stop changing Pro-Choice to Pro-Abortion on Planned Parenthood, even if you change it back immediately. Cheers! --Matt 21:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Same thing with changing it from "health clinic" to "abortion clinic" and back. It's disruptive instead of being constructive. Cheers! --Matt 17:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

-- Banes 21:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Martin. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Luna Santin 03:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Pierre Trudeau, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Paul Martin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 03:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to John Kerry, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 19:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tony Blair, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 19:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Ed (Edgar181) 19:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

André Boisclair

Please stop vandalizing the André Boisclair article by removing references to his Roman Catholicism. Wikipedia is not a forum for the expression of your political views. Thank you. Skeezix1000 11:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Pilotguy (roger that) 16:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Editing other's comments on Talk pages

Proper style and grammar are important on articles; however, on Talk pages, please don't modify what others say for proper punctuation and grammar - someone signed their name on it. Cheers --Matt 16:32, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edits of 9 December

It appears that edits from this IP to Arnold Schwarznegger are either vandalism or from lack of knowledge of his nationality, and the edits to Canadian politicians' religion result from disagreement with their position on abortion as discussed above. These can be characterized as vandalism particulary given the block history and the discussion on this talk page. Please stop before this IP is blocked again. Kablammo 00:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted the edits which removed the religious affiliation from the Canadian politicians. This was discussed above and there appears to be a consensus from commentators other than you that such actions are incorrect. Kablammo 00:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Fred Phelps

Your recent edit to Fred Phelps (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kablammo 00:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/9/2E/User_talk%7E69.136.96.119.html"