User talk:69.117.20.128

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user thinks that registration should be required to edit articles.

Just thought that the irony would be amusing.



[edit] BG Color

I don't see any reason to change the background color, and unless there is a special case, there is no reason not for it to conform to the standard. Yono 02:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

The colors are standardized by topic. --DanielCD 15:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Inclusive classroom

That's your opinion, which you are entitled to. I agree that as the article stands, it's biased in favour of inclusive education; but you can't counter bias with bias. See Wikipedia's neutrality policy. - Mike Rosoft 16:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Fine, but you can't state opinion as a fact, and you can't put your private opinion in articles (original research generally doesn't belong in Wikipedia). - Mike Rosoft 16:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


Your additions seem to be a straw man attack against inclusive education, an attempt to counter an argument the proponents do not actually make in the first place.

Somebody might argue that freedom of speech is an utopia, because you can't falsely shout "fire" in a crowded cinema, or - for an even more extreme example - tell somebody to commit murder. And I would respond: nobody argues that this kind of speech should be protected as a human right; in other words, your right to freedom of speech is not unlimited.

Similarly, the proponents of inclusive education don't deny that some children need specialized care; they just argue that education should be inclusive to an extent it can be done. - Mike Rosoft 16:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I DID read your edits; that's why I had reverted them. - Mike Rosoft 16:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Ditto - please don't remove content Stephenb (Talk) 16:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi there. I noticed that you reinstated some point-of-view material into this article. I appreciate your concerns about this article, and agree that it needs work to bring it to a neutral point of view. However, your editorial comments are clearly not appropriate for an encyclopedic resource. I would appreciate it if you could rewrite your introduction in a neutral tone, or if you could offer me some suggestions as to what would satisfy you in order to prevent this turning into an edit war. I am also posting this to the article talk page so we can engage other editors in discussion. Thanks! --Xnuala (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/9/2E/User_talk%7E69.117.20.128.html"