User talk:69.108.175.213

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I notice that you have added "oxane" to the list of other names for water in the article water (molecule). Oxane is a synonym for tetrahydropyran, and sometimes for oxirane, but I don't believe it has been used as a synonym for water. Do you have a reference to back this up? If you do, it should certainly stay; but otherwise I think removing it from the article is reasonable.

Lastly, please do not label other's edits as vandalism unless it is clear that they are intentionally attempting to damage the article. Assuming good faith is a pillar of the Wikipedia community. --Ed (Edgar181) 18:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Those oxanes are asystematic and don't even nearly fit the naming rules for organic compounds: [1]. I put water as oxane because it matches the other inorganic covalent hydrides--hydronia, rather. What about a disambiguation? -lysdexia 14:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
And [2] says the IUPAC already accepts oxane! -lysdexia
Cool. Oxane is now a disambig page, as you suggested. --Ed (Edgar181) 15:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Invitation

Lysdexia, I would like to invite you to register as a Wikipedian. I don't know if the name "Lysdexia" is already in use or not; hopefully, it is. Registration costs nothing and adds credibility to your edits. Also, some pages can't be edited by non-registered users. We'd love to have you on board! RobertAustin 13:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Read Talk:Untranslatability#disputed. I already was a Wikipedian yester I was wrongly banned forever by the ignorant shyster and liar Rdsmith who never answerd my rebuttals to the normative reedits to my corrections in many articuli. -lysdexia 18:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
BTW, how did you find me? -lysdexia

[edit] Your edits to the Ramdrake talk page

Hello, lysdexia. I was wondering what the point was with your remarks on my talk page, as these comments seem to apply to a message another user wrote to me, thus my wondering what this comment is all about. You can answer if you want on my talk page.--Ramdrake 22:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I was wondering that myself. L0b0t 22:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "Rdsmith4's block of lysdexia and now of User:69.108.175.213 was to push his libel of my work and to keep inaccurate and antigrammatic wording and markup in several of Wikipedia's pages. In his fake reason for blocking he maintaind that lysdexia's edits were trolls, when they were not. Rdsmith4 uses his illiteracies as excuse to suppress my corrections to Wikipedians' grammar and exposition. His perpetual block of lysdexia is to disrupt the work and corrections to a few scientific articuli I'd bene a'helping on, which sufferd from their misleadings over the months that I could not reedit them. He should be blocked and demoted for the equal time that he unfairly blockd lysdexia—he does not understand the subject, nor of Wikipedia's procedure and policy, and broke them (no warning, "good faith", 3RR, V, reply, appeal, arbitration) without check or penalty. Thus, he is a liar, libeller, shyster, rogue, illiterate, ineducate, and obscurant."


Decline reason: "No."

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

[edit] Edits to my user page

This user posted some spelling errors that I made on my user page, following with 'illiterate shithead' as a closing statement. Clearly this user is not fit to continue editing on wikipedia and I support the renewed ban on this users IP. --Thaddius 16:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)