User talk:68.45.161.241

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
  • Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
  • Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Brokeback Mountain. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Hansnesse 02:26, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- KOS | talk 14:15, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edits to Same-sex marriage

Welcome to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits, please take a look at WP:No original research. Thanks. Fireplace 04:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Placing a false/misleading AfD to another article's entry is blatant vandalism.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Same-sex marriage, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. ju66l3r 17:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Unconstructive? It seems your objections are more political than anything else. Perhaps you are afraid of having other viewpoints represented. It's not original research because all of it has been around for a long, long time.

Perhaps you should stop trying to engage in censorship of viewpoints that scare you. There's an old saying in debating, you know you are winning the debate when the other side tries obstructing the other POV.

In my short time on Wikipedia, I have seen nothing but a consistent left-wing bias. The funny thing is it's not considered vandalism if a Left-leaning administrator logs onto the Paul Weyrich biography and introduces false and slanderous information.

The edits to the same-sex marriage article I made were constructive edits aimed at bringing ideological balance to the article, that as written is hopelessly POV.--68.45.161.241 18:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This IP address is named in an user conduct RFC

[edit] This IP address is named in an user conduct RFC

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pravknight. IP addresses used by Pravknight (talk • contribs):

FeloniousMonk 05:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I really don't care about your harrassing RfC. The only reason it exists is because you have an axe to grind with me because I'm a Christian.

--68.45.161.241 02:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

You are the problem and you know it. One thing about Lefties they are extremely intolerant when it comes to views they hate. Thus far I haven't been convinced that I have done anything wrong here, and your behavior has made me feel more persecuted than anything else. The RfC process is a sham aimed at keeping a Left-wing ideological purity on Wikipedia.--68.45.161.241 21:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

What's wrong with a little dismissing of your little Inquisition FM? The only thing you prove by banning me is just how broad-minded you are. BTW, WP:DICK--68.45.161.241 04:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 20 September

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 01:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 04:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Get a life and leave me alone. It's my talk page, not yours.--68.45.161.241 16:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Yandman 14:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

What personal attacks?

[edit] 6 January 2007

Please do not add personal commentary to articles. I have reverted your edit to American Revolution — Lost(talk) 07:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

In case you hadn't noticed. I restored the original article, which had been replaced with an offensive and disgusting form of vandalism.--68.45.161.241 19:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/8/2E/User_talk%7E68.45.161.241.html"