User talk:68.150.19.158

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Please remember that Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine and that it is policy to always take a neutral point of view. Your recent edits to Ashida Kim are contrary to these policies. Please do not make further edits to this page without reading and understanding what Wikipedia is not and neutral point of view. Thank you.—chris.lawson (talk) 12:23, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] A warning

Ashida Kim is a controversial subject which is currently being disputed. Your edits are being made without discussion by you on the Talk:Ashida Kim page. At wikipedia we have a three revert rule to prevent what you are doing from becoming a problem to other editors. If you revert to your version one more time, you will be blocked from editing. --Fire Star 12:30, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Due to [1], [2], [3] you're close to being blocked. Please refrain on insisting. -- (☺drini♫|☎) 20:18, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

You've been blocked due to WP:3RR on [4] -- (☺drini♫|☎) 21:03, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.—chris.lawson (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.—chris.lawson (talk) 21:57, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hall Monitor 23:30, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Actually, the only edit I'm making is removing a link that contains information not permitted by Wikipedia. If you want to support such information, then that's your call. But my edits do not influence the neutrality of the article, nor is it propaganda or vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.150.19.158 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

I'd love to know where you got the impression said link contains "information not permitted by Wikipedia."—chris.lawson (talk) 23:42, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for vandalism

You have been blocked for 48 hours in direct violation of the WP:3RR policy and continually removing content from an article without community consensus. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Hall Monitor 23:45, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ashida Kim, again...

Removing content without discussion is, as you know, considered vandalism. If you continue, you will be blocked. This is your last warning. --Fire Star 15:04, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for a long time

For posting personal information on Jimbo's user page, you've been blocked for quite some time. Redwolf24 (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Summary of your edits: Vandalism to User:Jimbo Wales and Ashida Kim. No useful contribs, so I can't feel remorse in blocking you for 61 years... Redwolf24 (talk) 02:29, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/8/2E/User_talk%7E68.150.19.158.html"