User talk:68.107.245.70

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Hi there -- thanks for jumping in and editing!

I noticed your edits to Connecticut. While I think that they are generally adding some needed balance to the article and are helpful, there was one section that is more opinion than fact (I think) when it talks about "Connecticut's independent streak"-- "Connecticut's independent streak is most apparent in its choice for Governor, as the Democrats have failed to win the office since 1986, losing four straight elections to independent Lowell Weicker and Republican John Rowland. Rowland's successor, M. Jodi Rell, is favored to win the 2006 election. Many speculate that Connecticut voters are hesitant to give one party control of state government after the massive expansion in taxes and spending that occurred in the final years of the William O'Neill administration."

So I offer you the following welcome message which has some great links for advice on editing:

[edit] Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

Anyone can edit here, of course, but there are advantages to creating an account if you want to contribute on a regular basis. If you want to join up, create an account and then introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the tasks below: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

And once you have an account, you can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

[edit]

Here are some tasks you can do:

Again, welcome! BCorr|Брайен 11:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Linking sources

Just as a note since you seem to be adding a number of paragraphs to the Ned Lamont page. When you put in a source, you should either put square brackets [http://en.wikipedia.org] or <ref>http://en.wikipedia.org</ref> around the URL rather than just pasting the URL into the article itself. Cleans up the article a bit and saves other editors having to go back into the article and add the tags. As to which one to use, easiest way to do that is to look at the other citations in the article. If the citations look like this [1] then they are using the square bracket method. If the citations look like this [1] then they are using the ref method. See WP:CITE for more information. Thanks! --Bobblehead 23:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

When using the bracket method use a single squarebracket. Double brackets are used to link to wikipages. So in the case of your most recent edit, you'd put [http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2006/07/21/lamont_earned_28_million_in_2005_tax_returns_show/]. However, the Ned Lamont page seems to be using <ref>http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2006/07/21/lamont_earned_28_million_in_2005_tax_returns_show/</ref> --Bobblehead 23:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/8/2E/User_talk%7E68.107.245.70.html"