User talk:68.10.35.153

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

TO ALL COMMENTATORS:

Fuck you, fuck Wikipedia, and fuck off.

All comments posted on this page will be taken in light of the preceding sentence.

Contents

[edit] Bill White Article

Bill, I talked to Will Beback, and I'm going to see about salvaging your recent edits to your own Bio. Though I stand on the opposite side as you, your edits did make the article much better. I probably will have the hybrid of the two versions done in the next few days, and then I'm going to tag it as needing citations. Please track down any citations you can, this will stop the changes from being reverted.

And create an account, would you?

Sadena 13:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires you to provide no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
  • Your own user page
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
  • The ability to rename pages
  • The ability to upload images
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
  • The eligibility to become an administrator
  • The right to be heard in formal votes and elections, and on pages like votes for deletion
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. - Willmcw 19:02, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

PS - Thanks for your contributions. Two important policies in Wikipedia are Wikipedia: No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. In particular, I see that you've been adding information that seems to come from your personal experience rather than from newspaper accounts or other verifiable sources. Please only use facts that you have a source for, and cite your sources. Thanks, -Willmcw 19:02, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

Someone who posts unsourced crap from the chans shouldn't talk about original resource. Go fuck yourself you anti-racist pig.

[edit] 3RR

You and your user account User:Baxter3 appear to have violated the Three revert rule (3RR) at William White (agitator). As you haven't been warned before, I'm not going to report it, but if you do it again, you will be reported, and are likely to be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours for each offense. Please also read our core policies before editing any further, particularly No original research, Neutral point of view, Verifiability, and Cite sources. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:56, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

SlimVirgin: I have repeatedly undone vandalism you performed on the page, and I was not the only user to do so. I am reporting you for page vandalism and violations of the 3RR rule, and asking for dispute resolution. You are abusing Wikipedia policies for your own political ends, and that is not acceptable. This is also not the first time you have done so. 68.10.35.153 00:58, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
For the record, only you and Sam Spade have reverted my edits. Other editors on the page have expressed agreement with them; and edits don't count as vandalism just because you don't like them. If you would stop your reverting, and wait until I've finished editing the page (which may take a few days), you might find you actually prefer the new version. It will be more encyclopedic, will explain why White is of interest (which your version fails to do), and will be fully referenced. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:04, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
You and Willmcw are the only wo editors really involved, and Willmcw is not rving to your versions. Your edits are being incorporated itno the article -- in fact, I even footnoted your articlef or you (which one of your own followers deleted!). Massive deleting of cited sources, followed by a complaint that the article is "not sourced" and must be deleted, is vandalism, as there is no intellectual honesty involved. 68.10.35.153 18:32, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bill White (activist)

I've just about finished the rewrite of this page. If you take a close look at it, I think you'll find that it's a fair and well-sourced write up. (In case it's been changed since I last looked, check the last version under my name.) I've tried to stick closely to what the third-party sources say, and linked to them whenever I could - though sometimes I had to link to websites other than those of the news organizations, because not all the articles are online. Rather than reverting, how about letting me know what specifically you disagree with, if anything? Or if you think something important has been left out, or something has been emphasized unfairly, please say how you think it could be rectified, bearing in mind that it probably shouldn't get much longer. Regarding the list of articles you wanted, Willmcw suggested as a compromise that we put a link to the list on your website under External links; he or I will do that as soon as we can access your site. I'm also posting this to User:Baxter2 and User:Baxter3. SlimVirgin (talk) 09:33, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] vandalism

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 23:15, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jerry Springer

You dont need to put the adress of Jerry and Steve, its not right. Koolgiy


[edit] February 2007

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to World Union of National Socialists, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. RJASE1 02:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

I didn't make the edits, and I am not Wewelsburg.

[edit] JDO

[1]: this would require source. Pavel Vozenilek 23:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Racist vandalism

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob Schiff. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Wikipedia is not a place for pushing forward anti-Semitic or racist agendas, but rather a place for neutral, objective and factual information. If you cannot contribute in a constructive manner, please do not contribute at all. I see that this is your third warning of a sort; if I see your IP associated with a racist comment again, I will take action to ban you. Have a nice day.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning LordAmeth 10:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Fuck off. The fact that you don't like the truth doesn't make it vandalism. And everything posted is well sourced.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/8/2E/User_talk%7E68.10.35.153.html"