User talk:67.77.253.132

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, 67.77.253.132, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

--

Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. This is especially a concern at Joseph Smith, Jr.. Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 15:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2nd warning for Joseph Smith, Jr. article

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Storm Rider (talk) 09:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Joseph Smith, Jr., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 04:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

i got 50 different ips and what you see as the truth does not concur with mine. you need to stop posting lies or i might inventory my resources and get you banned. your position is no greater than mine. to claim some wacko got divine tablets from "god"///yeah ok, whatever buddy. you need to research reality a bit yourself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.77.253.132 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 15 January 2007.
The issue isn't what either of us believe. The entire point of neutral point of view is to provide a balanced description of what can be proven. If you read the articles, the don't claim that what Mormons believe are true. The articles state what Mormons believe. Your edits express your beliefs as though they were truth. That is the main issue. Your edits should be balanced. It is fine to say something like "Many don't believe this", but it is not O.K. to say something like "This is a load of crap".
BTW - you might also want to read about Sock Puppets wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 14:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

if i was not allowed to edit anonymously then it simply would not happen now would it? and yes the article is proclaiming what is being stated as being true, and this is far from what evidence is at hand. what gets me is who in the hell you people think you are to go and issue warnings when you yourselves are attempting to pass such dogma off as fact? likely you really believe joe smith jr. is some kind of godhead and you hope to curry divine favour...i dont know. but in any case i never made an edit stating "this is a load of crap" and everything i did edit was akin to "many don't believe this". still i do think this entry needs a 100% rewrite from an unbiased perspective like my own. cheers - brethren —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.77.253.132 (talk • contribs).00:54, 16 January 2007}}

The unique feature of Wikipedia is that all viewpoints get equal weight. Your opinion is just as important as mine. However, entries should have a balanced point of view. A reader should go away knowing most/all sides of any arguments, opinions, etc. about a topic, but hopefully they haven't had their mind changed by the article (except, of course, by the facts.) -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 04:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/7/2E/User_talk%7E67.77.253.132.html"