User talk:67.37.235.161

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of AgainstFakeClaims.
Please refer to both have vandalized Talk:Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath and Talk:Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath/Archive 1 in similar ways with similar wording for evidence. See block log.

[edit] Nath discussion

The user who is claiming to be have sole authorship - how can he claim to be no nonsense and note all proper and acurate edits as vandalism and blockable acts.

There are several editors writing this article which has come to be in the state it is in through discussion on the talk page. If you are sincere in your interest in the subject, please create an account and join the discussion. Please do not change facts which are documented in the references to "claims" - they are established facts in academic sources. Also, please read about Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Finally, if you have facts to add, please cite a reputable academic reference for them. ---Baba Louis 00:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Will do. Any TDH can write a new age book and then can claim the contents to be verifiable for publishing on WP. Till peer reviews are done , the facts have to be characterized by words claimed or purported. Further the text is against traditional ancient bharatiya culture and values.

Actually, that is not the case. One does not have to use the word "claims" when the claim is not outlandish and/or is supported by a reference to a publication by an academic press. Please do some reading in Wikipedia goals and policies before futher editing. —Adityanath 00:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Adityanath 00:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Adityanath 00:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AmiDaniel (Talk) 00:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

AmiDaniel - I beg to differ. The edits were sincere in purpose and accurate.

I concur - there is no evidence of vandalism in the article itself. In fact, I find the edits quite lucid. Discussion page text should not have been deleted - beginner's error. Kalagni Nath 04:28, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath/Archive 1. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Adityanath 01:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/7/2E/User_talk%7E67.37.235.161.html"