User talk:67.190.61.6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my Talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome!

Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.--User:Shark Fin 101

[edit] Assume Good Faith

Dear sir or madame: Please try to assume good faith when dealing with other contributors. That assumption, along with civility, is key to productive editing. This especially applies to making threats towards other users; I've noticed several you've directed towards people editing Neil Bush. You may not be aware of this, but it usually takes an RFA to ban a user, not counting short temporary bans for 3RR violations and the like. You may want to educate yourself on these areas further as it will help you present yourself in a more credible manner to other editors. Have a great day.--67.101.67.197 19:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism isn't good faith. Here's some reading for YOU. Educate YOURSELF. If you disagree with the admin on the Neil Bush page who is reverting the vandalism there, then I suggest you take it up with her. You are wasting your time harrassing me here. Goodbye. 67.190.61.6 05:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk Page Etiquette

Hello again. Another pointer: it's generally considered bad form to remove recent comments from your (or anyones') talk page - in some cases it's even considered vandalism. You may wish to review Wikipedia:Talk_pages, especially the Etiquette section. --67.101.67.197 13:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism isn't good faith. Here's some reading for YOU. Educate YOURSELF. If you disagree with the admin on the Neil Bush page who is reverting the vandalism there, then I suggest you take it up with her. You are wasting your time harrassing me here. Goodbye. 67.190.61.6 05:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

NOTICE - DO NOT use this talk page to harrass me and justify vandalism at Wikipedia. This is a page to discuss LEGITIMATE Wikipedia issues not spamming, harrassing and insulting me with nonsense. Any more attempts to alter this page in that manner will be considered harrassment and will be reported as vandalism to Wikipedia administrators. If you want to support the vandalism of the Neil Bush page, take it up with the admin there who is currently reverting the vandalism there. I'm sure the admin will be happy to explain Wikipedia policy on vandalism to you. Trying to justify breaking Wikipedia policy (vandalism) on this user's page is insulting, useless spam. Take it up with an admin. Your harassment is useless here. 67.190.61.6 02:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Abrasive Talk

I have been following your discussion on Neil Bush, and I must also say you should reign in your accusations and diatribes. Given your IP is from Denver, I'm betting you have some personal beef against Neil Bush.AuntEthel 17:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I will always denounce vandalism "AuntEthel". Not sure what a Denver IP address has to do with Neil Bush, but you can take off your tin-foil hat b/c I have no idea what connection you're trying to make. If you bother to actaully read the Talk Page and follow the events there, you may notice it's about wikipedia guidelines and policy not being followed... not tin-foil hats and some bizarre Denver/Neil Bush conspiracy you've come up with. Also, while you're there and have your tin-foil hat on, you may notice the IPs from TEXAS trying to edit out info... wonder what they are doing? Let me know what your tin-foil hat tells you about them. Oh, yeah... and if you're feeling really frisky, AuntEthel, you might want to also notice that an admin (among others) has reverted the vandalism there as well. If you have a problem with people being upset about vandalism, I would suggest you adjust your tin-foil hat and shove it up your.... or rather, take it up with the admin directly. Good luck with your conspiracy caper distraction. 67.190.61.6 18:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Wow! I sure hit a nerve! If you really don't know why Denver is relevant, (but I'm sure you do), you really should not be contributing to that article. Maybe you should read the book. There's certainly a stronger link between Bush/Denver than Bush/Boris.AuntEthel 15:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
No, I don't know the Bush/Denver link despite your assuredness that I do. You should add it if it's notable, relevant, well-documented and sourced. A quick search on Google turned up lots of info, including him having the biggest house or something, savings and loan thing, etc. But I don't know what's the big secret Denver connection your alluding to and believe it or not, I don't really care. BTW, you'll pretty much always strike a nerve when you accuse people of alterior motives out of the blue... especially with a Wikipedia account you create out of the blue and don't do any edits and just come straight to that person's talk page. I'm sure the people that have IP addresses that resolve to Texas wouldn't appreciate if I went to thier talk pages and said that meant they had some kind of geographical agenda. I hate to break it to you, but I'm not from Denver. I've been here less than a year and have been too busy with life to run around trying to find a Neil Bush/Denver connection. Later. Aunty 67.190.61.6 08:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk Page Etiquette, Take 2

I see someone else has already told you about not editing other's comments in the talk pages. Consider this a second notice. Shortcut.road 20:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Shortcut.road 20:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

BlazinBugger, READ THIS NOW:

Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines

Behavior that is unacceptable: Please note that the following are of sufficient importance to be official Wikipedia policy. Violations (and especially repeated violations) may lead to the offender being banned from Wikipedia.

  • Don't threaten people: For example, threatening people with "admins you know" or having them banned for disagreeing with you.

Since you are so fond of being a stickler for rules. Start following them yourself ASAP. Get to work. Do your job. NOW. If you continue this harrassment of me on my Talk page, I'm going to request assis

Shortcut, you're the one who should be worried about being blocked, not me. 67.190.61.6 09:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk Page Etiquette, Take 3

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Talk:Neil Bush, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

BlazinBuggles 00:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

BlazinBugger, READ THIS NOW:

Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines

Behavior that is unacceptable: Please note that the following are of sufficient importance to be official Wikipedia policy. Violations (and especially repeated violations) may lead to the offender being banned from Wikipedia.

  • Don't threaten people: For example, threatening people with "admins you know" or having them banned for disagreeing with you.

Since you are so fond of being a stickler for rules. Start following them yourself ASAP. Get to work. Do your job. NOW. If you continue this harrassment of me on my Talk page, I'm going to request assistance to get you to follow some guidelines YOURSELF for once. 67.190.61.6 14:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You are not Boss

I noticed you threaten me with banning. You must know, as it seems you are much farther down that road. It is good you have no power to act. Schlotzsman 20:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I am not the "Boss"

I am not the "Boss"

I am not the "Boss"

Whoop! Whoop! Alert!!! Alert!!! Whose the boss? I am not the boss.

I am not the "Boss"

I am not the "Boss"

I am not the "Boss"

Hey, thanks for giving me a head's up. I thought I was the "boss" up to now.


[edit] Neil Bush mediation

Here's a heads up that you will want to comment here. --67.101.67.107 13:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah.... I just lured the others to go there like a moth to a flame... and they did. As they were predictable in every other way... they predictably hauled ass into that flame. Thank God the wicked are also often dumb as hell as well. 67.190.61.6 12:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/7/2E/User_talk%7E67.190.61.6.html"