User talk:67.18.109.218

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "This is a shared IP. No one from this computer net is able to create user names in order to contribute wo Wikipedia. Why was this computer banned?"


Decline reason: "No evidence this is shared. —Pilotguy (ptt) 03:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "What evidence do you need? This is a proxy server for a CS lab. We are unable to create any accounts for research since this main IP is blocked; it's a pain in the ass to go to another computer to create the accounts so we can use it on this net."


Decline reason: "If that's the case, I would have your system administrator look into this. There is a long history of abuse and vandalism to wikipedia doe by your colleagues. —Pilotguy go around 01:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Oh, you beat me to the decline.

Sorry for your inconvenience, but we cannot unblock this IP address at present. Too much vandalism and abuse has been received from this IP to make the risk worthwhile. Also, the IP address is owned by a website hosting company... that makes me leery that this IP address might be a proxy. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)