User talk:67.174.232.187

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. --Gurubrahma 13:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Pl stop making edits without verifiable sources

-Cribananda 08:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

You were warned. Don't remove material repeatedly. You're free to edit when the block expires, but please follow the basic policies. There is plenty to help out with here. - Taxman Talk 05:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Mr Taxman,
Let me put the record straight. I didnt remove material repeatedly. Yes i did it my first couple of days on wikipedia, but that was because i didnt know about the talk page or how it worked. To hold that against a newcomer, only betrays the bully and biased individual in you. I am flabbergasted to see that you didnt even feel the need to ask me for an explanation before u did what you did.
As for Cribananda, i have raised some questions on his bharatanatya talk page which he has stubbornly chosen very conveniently to turn a deaf ear and a blind eye. Yes the talk page is for people to discuss issues before they go ahead and make changes. But what do you do if people *REFUSE* to discuss on the talk page. That leaves u no option but to go ahead and make changes as u see fit. And then, when a newbie does that, how convenient is it for an 'oldie' to go to town with accusations of 'vandalism'!! And dont tell me that i have to give enough time for people to notice my concerns on the talk page and respond...Cirbananda was completely aware of my posts on the talk page and has *DELIBERATELY* chosen to ignore it till now. You as an admin would do well to talk some sense into him.
He cannot go around merrily tagging pages (like he did on the kannada page) and when somebody tags his page for the very same reasons he tagged another page, he cant foist a vandalism charge on the member, a newbie at that!!
  • I feel I don't owe you any explanation, and I'm not here to pick a fight with you.-Cribananda 16:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Neither am I. Its below my dignity to pick up a fight with anyone who doesnt have the basic courtesy to discuss on the talk page before he posts any crap.67.174.232.187 06:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Though you have read sources I have given you, and dismissed the bbc as someone who would publish 'anything', have you given a single source (believable or otherwise) for any change you made?67.174.232.187 06:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Are you deaf or are you blind or are u illiterate?? Cant you read what i have written on this very page?!!! I told you I was new here and didnt know how the Talk page worked...the first few times i edited the article page. How many more times do I have to reiterate this point till it gets into your brain??
  • And can you please point out where and when I have dismissed BBC as somebody who will publish 'ANYTHING'?? All that I have said and said quite a few times on the BN talk page is, "THAT BBC LINK THAT YOU HAVE PROVIDED TALKS NOTHING ABOUT THE ORIGINS OF BHARATANATYAM!!! I DONT WANT TO REPEAT WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN THERE AGAIN..SO YOU CAN GO THERE AND READ AGAIN" and if you dont understand english, you can enlist the services of a translator.
  • But stop for a little bit, and see how much you have 'contributed' to the 'encyclopaedia' since you have been here..... Only personal vengeance seems to be your driving factor. you just want to make a point, please join a discussion forum.67.174.232.187 06:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • woah!! woah!! woah!!! hold it!! save this condescending, know it all, self righteous tone for your kids, if you have any or when you have any. it is YOU who are stubbornly and blatantly refusing to answer any of my concerns...and BECAUSE you were indifferent to my concerns, I went ahead and edited it a couple of times....and say I am driven by personal venegance!!! what cheek!!
  • am saying this again, dont waste my time and YOUR time and everyone's time by playing to the gallery here and garnering some sympathy votes!! go to the Bharatanatya talk page and answer my questions.67.174.232.187 06:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • and finally, stop calling it 'my' page. It is no more 'my' page than the page on Kannada is. Best regards.-Cribananda 16:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • you say its BN is no more your page than the page on kannada is. how then is it that, even though there is unsubstantiated info on the BN page, you dont feel the need to tag it. and on the kannada page, even when there are links to substantiate somebody's claim, you disregard that and go ahead with the tagging. is that typical of the way all bullies behave??67.174.232.187 06:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] T.Nagar

Why did you remove the picture from the T.Nagar article? Can you please explain on my talk page or on the article's talk page? - Ganeshk (talk) 05:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks,vandalism,etc.,

Can you please stop making personal attacks against other individuals/communities/languages? Using language like this is unacceptable here and it is counter-productive for everyone, including yourself. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the policies included below. --Pamri • Talk 08:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

LOOK!! like i've explained before somewhere else, am new here. there are a few things every newcomer takes some time to learn. the only thing i will ever own up as having done wrong is using the word goltis. other than that the other thing i did was revert some posts repeatedly - that too only on a couple of occasions - and that was because i wasnt aware of the talk page and how it worked.
once i discovered the talk page, (soon after some gurubrahma asked me to discuss on the talk page), i've been using it. i've used it extensively in my contribs on tamil lang and bharatanatya. not very long after i started doing that, i realised that the talk page was actually a joke, meant only to be used by veterans here to bully newcomers and obfuscate things.
my concern that i raised in the bharatnatya talk page hasnt been responded to yet. at the same time, cirba has gone ahead with his blatantly biased and cooked up stories in the article page.
now that i have done some reading here...i would like YOU to lookup wiki's policies about how to treat newcomers...and also read carefully as to what does NOT constitute vandalism.
as for all the links you have mentioned below, i have realised it is you guys who have more use for them. so i suggest you go through those links again.
if you have anything to tell me, respond to the points i have raised in the talk pages of various articles i've edited. that would be a more constructive use of your time and my time, than spamming my user talk page.
so next time you have anything to say, it better be in response to any concerns i raise in a talk page of some article. if you cant do that, stay away and keep your self righteous attitude to yourself.

[edit] Edits

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia.

BUZZ OFF 67.174.232.187
Thank you for making a good faith constructive edit on your second attempt. Because you have done so, I am removing the template I added to your talk page. --BostonMA 12:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/7/2E/User_talk%7E67.174.232.187.html"