User talk:67.172.194.15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] warnings

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (Signed: J.Smith) 08:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (Signed: J.Smith) 07:36, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

Please go read the guidelines on Neutral point of view. Also, any claims you make NEED sources. I rewrote the nonsense you were trying to add and removed the unverifiable parts. (Signed: J.Smith) 08:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. (Signed: J.Smith) 07:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 69.4.136.3 21:35, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

DEFENDING OUR BASE

[edit] Star Sonata

Please join the discussion on the article talk page. I've created a list of points that need verifying and/or citing, made by both yourself and J Smith. Both of you seem to know more about the game itself (different teams, I'm guessing, though!) but you both seem to have made edits that insert claims that have not been verified. (That is not saying they are not true, they just need to be verifable as per WP:V, please have a quick read of that, if you haven't already done so. (I've also pointed out that link to J. Smith, so I'm trying to be balanced (or equally nasty :) to everyone! Cheers. MartinRe 10:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Emma Watson

Go read WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. Now. RadioKirk talk to me 06:28, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


templates substituted as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 20:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Star Sonata

First of all, please engage in unseeing the talk page. You reverted legitimate changes (such as my modifying of the date style to fit with WP:MOS and the 4th unsourced developer?) Why? Explain? I will not engage in a edit war with you, but I do demand to know the reasoning for your revert. ---J.Smith 06:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 07:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] warning

Thank you for experimenting with the page Talk:Kakapo on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AmiDaniel (Talk) 23:13, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. ---J.Smith 16:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your reverts.

From your edit summery: "rv vandalism. what is this? gang reverts. this is WIKIPEDIA, you have to PROVE what you say"

Actually, everything in the article you have deleted was duly sourced and I've verified directly with the administrators of wikipedia that the name you keep trying to add is not a real admin. I'm simply confounded that you can continue to think your right. It's not ok to continue to vandalise this article. I'm advancing this to the next level. ---J.Smith 02:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

hi, please be aware that you have violated wikipedia's three-revert rule, which states that no editor may revert a page more than three times in 24 hours. you have reverted 5 times already on Star Sonata, and if it continues, you will be blocked from editing. thanks --Heah? 08:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been blocked for 48 hours for calling other good faith contributors vandals, incivility in edit summaries, and last but not least, the impersonation of another user.[1] Please do not continue on this path upon your return, or you will find yourself blocked for progressively longer periods of time. This is your second block in just a few days. --Heah? 07:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC)