User talk:67.137.28.187

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 66.30.254.82 00:20, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 66.30.254.82 00:34, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Please DO NOT REMOVE the vfd notice. When the issue is settled (after a decision had been made) the tag will be removed or the article deleted (depending on the outcome). Meanwhile, do not remove the notice. -- (☺drini♫|☎) 00:37, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Please review closely and adhere to Wikipedia:No legal threats and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. TIA. El_C 00:47, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours for disrupting Wikipedia. You will still be able to edit this page to discuss the block if you wish to. ~~ N (t/c) 00:49, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

By the way, it might help if you tell us what copyrighted/banned/libelous materials are being linked to. ~~ N (t/c) 00:56, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

FROM JMERKEY: The Novell Ruling, and any Court pleadings are currently the subject of sealing orders from the Courts. The Novell/TRG settlement and ruling were sealed after the case was settled with the exception of a single copy of the ruling that was published in the copyrighted US Patent Quarterly Journal. If you post them here, Under Section 203 of the Communications Decency Act, Wikipedia will be liable as will any authors or posters of this content. At present, I view this wiki page as a further attempt at harassement by the SCOX message board "lynch mob". I was wrongly associated with SCO and their litigation against Linux by a group of people who opposed my Open Source Operating System projects. The people behind this are folks who want to ruin my reputation on the internet and create misinformation in order to create false impressions my work is somehow "bad" and "Tainted." I have been threatened with death, shooting, guns, firebombs, rape, murder, and other actions by these people who are behind these postings. Despite Wiki's policies, I will tell all of you that I will take whatever steps are necessary to protect my family from these people and their conduct, and it should be clear just how serious I am about this to wiki. I have contacted wiki's offices on Florida and have obtained the address of service of ALL of wiki's directors and letters will be going out to them this week. I would STRONGLY ADVISE deleting any materials about me for the time being, or sticking to materials and content I have approved and verified for you as factual.

FROM JMERKEY: The Novell Ruling, and any Court pleadings are currently the subject of sealing wax from the navel of a siberian tiger. The Navel fluff and roller were scuttled after the craze was bottled with the exception of a single jar of smegma that was left sitting on the breakfast bar in merkey's wigwam. If you post them here, please attach the correct postage, as COD is unacceptable.. At present, I view this wiki page using apiece of technology known as browser. I own all the IP for browsers, and in conjunction with SCO and their litigation against Linux, I am going to sue M$, Netscape, Mozilla, Opera, Konqueror and any other browser writers for stealing my ideas. The people behind this are those who want tell the truth about me on the internet despite my attempts to suppress my emabarrassing past. My work is somehow "bad" and "Tainted. I don't know why, but everything I do is crap.

I have been threatened with the comfy chair, tickling under the armpits, a soft cushion and other actions by these people who are behind these postings. Despite Wiki's policies, I will tell all of you that I will take whatever steps are necessary to learn how to do the Rumba. I have contacted wiki's offices on the mooooooooon and have obtained the address of a good pizza delivery service for of ALL of wiki's directors and pizzas will be going out to them this week. I would STRONGLY ADVISE you all to alugh long and loud at my conduct, as it's clear I am seriously mentally unstable.

Jeffro Q Merkustitty.

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Exabit 06:37, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Talk:Cherokee

Please don't remove other people's comments from Talk pages. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:50, 16 September 2005 (UTC)


Dear Zoe. Unblock my access or I will call Jimbo Wales cell phone and complain again. personal attacks are prohibited on wikipedia. You have 5 minutes to comply. 67.137.28.187 22:58, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

I'll be waiting to hear from him. You do know that Wikipedia:No legal threats is a legitimate blocking criterion, right? User:Zoe|(talk) 23:04, 16 September 2005 (UTC)


There have been no legal threats posted on this site. There has been a notice posted on Merkeylaw. You need to understand, I am a litigant in a pending Federal Court action as an attorney Pro Se. As such, I have obligations when I see sealed Court documents or there are excerpts from these documents posted to your site to notify people and explain. It certainly looks like a lot of these folks have never been inside a civil action, and it can be a rough and nasty road. I am just trying to save everyone the hassle, me included. Please be aware I have tried **VERY** hard to not make such statements, however, if there is sealed Court language or discussions, and for whatever reason, Novell takes offense, Wikipedia could become a target. Jimbo was a really nice person on the phone when I talked to him, and I love and admire what is being done here. Were Novell to bring action against me and wikipedia, your donators and sponsors could get severely harrassed. There's the Wiki world and there's the real world. They will not fund this effort is it's being sued by Novell. Novell has billions of dollars to spent on litigation, wiki does not. If you see anyone posting the sealed materials, you need to REVOKE them from this site. Revoking me isn't going to solve the problem. There's enough versions of this text already posted here to get you in trouble. I am writing articles about my people. For someone to make statements I am not Cherokee when I am a member of the Cherokee Nation then call me "infamous" is insulting.

You need to understand, in my culture, these types of insults or racial slurs are highly offensive. We are indians, and I am an indian, and we don't react the way most people do. We are **VERY** agressive people as a rule, but good hearted and generous beyond belief. There is also a strong social imperative to obey the rules and the law. This user posted comments which are libel -- period. Now think about it. You block the person complaining but allow the libeler to keep libeling. This is opposite to what you should do. You need to consider what you are doing. All I have to do is back away, Novell will come. They won;t come near this stie if they think I protect it. I have agreements which protect me and what I do. You do not. If it appears you are interering with me removing or noticing these people, they can nail you for "acting in bad faith." OK. Now turn on my account so I can get back to writing about my people and constructing a laguage tutorial and complete description of all the dances, ceremonies, and cherokee culture, and NAIL any of these idiots who want to post libel or harassing comments. Thanks. 67.137.28.187 23:38, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

" ...Similarly, slander, libel, or defamation of character is not to be tolerated on Wikipedia; true instances of such writing, that might legitimately expose Wikipedia to legal sanction, should immediately be called to the attention of an administrator and/or the community at large. Disagreements as to the identity of a person, their motivations for a given action, opinions of third parties about them, etc. do not fall under slander, however, and you will not be permitted to use legal threats as a bludgeon to get your POV enshrined in an article..."

Follow your own rules. 67.137.28.187 23:51, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

You know Jeff... If you would just stop talking, most of these problems would go away. But you just need to be in the limelight and so the threats and accusations pile up. Give it a rest. Any good lawyer will tell you that your mouth is your worst enemy. Shut off the computer, take the wife and kids out for a nice walk in the country. As a pro se litigant you really need to stop accumulating all this bad karma. Jerry 04:35, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

I sincerely apologize for posting inappropriate comments to wikipedia. I will refrain from doing so in the future. Please consider turning on my access prior to October 16 from this location. Thanks. 67.137.28.187 23:04, 19 September 2005 (UTC)


Drini, Thanks for helping me repost the original comments. I wanted the apology to be visible. Since this is a talk page, it should be under the control of the user, not the admins, but I guess this is not policy. 67.137.28.187 23:06, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Citations for Ani-kutani

Thank you for your responses at Talk:Ani-kutani. I would very much like to get the facts cites as throughly as is reasonably possible, for the benefit of those interested in doign further work on this subject, or just in informing themselves; and also to help make it clear that this is a valid article. The more specificaly we can provide sources for specific facts, the better. DES (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop editing your biography

Jeff, please stop editing your biography and read the guidelines on Autobiograpies. You'd be better off adding to the article Talk Page instead, or better, keep out of the editing process altogether. --MJ 18:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC).

I am not Merkey, I am his attorney, and I will edit all I please.

Right, whatever Jeff. Even with the pro-se attorney hat on, WP:AB still applies, as do WP:NPOV, WP:NOR and WP:V. I urge you again to refrain from editing your biography and keep your comments to the talk page or to yourself. --MJ 20:27, 27 September 2005 (UTC).

[edit] Vandalism accusations

Stop accusing people you disagree with of vandalism, and beware of the Three Revert Rule which you've already violated. I've advised you to stay away from the article about you before, and am doing so again now. If you don't, I doubt you'll remain unblocked much longer. --fvw* 19:30, 27 September 2005 (UTC)


This message is regarding the article Jeffrey Vernon Merkey. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. [ contribs • block • block log ] -- GraemeL (talk) 21:17, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] warning

Stop recreating deleted material or you will be blocked (again). --fvw* 21:42, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Upon whose authority can you delete material about you without peer review? If you dislike the article, then Afd it, isn;t this the process? Jeff 67.137.28.187 21:43, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --fvw* 21:46, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

So which is it, vandalism or disruption. I have the right to open an Arbcom dispute on the matter following WP:RFM. Be assured I will. Your admin privileges need to be revoked based upon your conduct here. Jeff. 67.137.28.187 21:52, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Please read WP:CSD and realise that fvw was well within his admin rights to delete that page in the way he did. 82.52.64.44 22:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Deletions which follow this policy must contain the appropriate headers in the file and tags. This is not what happened here. He just nuked the pages and blocked the creator. Its ok. I have plenty of Ip addresses to use. I will open an Arbcom on him tonight. 67.137.28.187 22:55, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/7/2E/User_talk%7E67.137.28.187.html"