User talk:67.100.48.189

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add spam to Wikipedia. Thanks. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 05:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 05:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Perhaps if you read the discussion page first you would realize that the content you keep deleting is the content that was discussed and agreed upon by multiple users, so please stop removing it. Thankyou. You are putting in links that now have been moved to a separate page and deleting links that are relevant to this article. Why are you doing this after it has already had a war, been locked, been discussed, and restored? Why? Did you not bother reading the discussion? 67.100.48.189 05:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

There was no useful discussion. What we decided is that your link has no place as it currently exists. Please refer to below. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. --Madchester 05:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

What commercial links???

You have spammed many articles on Wikipedia with information about the Webquests, even ones that are not directly connected to Dan Brown or his novels. Please refer to Wikipedia:Spam Also you stated that
I'll start adding the webquest sections all over wikipedia if that's what it takes. Yes, childish, but this is about principle
Please do not use Wikipedia as a battleground to prove your point. --Madchester 06:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Seconded. We would probably allow you to submit a link to your solutions site, if it was indeed a solutions site. student-rant.blogspot.com is NOT devoted only to solutions and will only confuse readers. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. abakharev 06:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Suspected Sockpuppet

Note that both 67.101.134.76 and 67.100.48.189 opened their accounts on May 11 and 10 respectively, and their only contributions have been to insert the Da Vinci Webquest info and external links to the site. After 67.100.48.189 was blocked for spamming numerous articles with the Webquest details (see contributions), this new account was 67.101.134.476 was opened to continue spamming Wikipedia with those details. The users have similar writing styles; both refer to Wikipedia administrators as mods, with emphasis on the capitalization of "MOD" on various talk page comments: (67.100.48.189 talk page comments 67.101.134.76 talk page comments) --Madchester 16:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Not to sound mean or anything, but you've just noticed? I also believe 67.101.128.103, 67.100.49.172, 67.101.128.6, and just about every IP in the 67.*.*.* range in the edit history of the Da Vinci Code is the same guy. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AFD Notice

[edit] The Da Vinci Code WebQuests listed for deletion

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Da Vinci Code WebQuests, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Da Vinci Code WebQuests. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] Reply

Erm...look who's talking! At least Rodgerbales had the decency to _ask_ me why i removed his link and pointed out other links that were in the same vein. Since I removed his link, I thought it fair to remove others' links as well, which I have. You, however, wasted an entire HOUR of my time and obviously have no respect for WP:3RR, WP:CIVIL, WP:BITE, WP:ATTACK, or WP:MoS. I would like to request that you STOP adding self-promoting links to Wikipedia. Please note that continued vandalism of Wikipedia will result in our contacting your ISP. Thanks. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)