User talk:67.0.66.27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia; you seem to be having some difficulty navigating your way around. Your edits to the REALbasic article are being reverted for a number of reasons. First, you discount certain sources, but provide no source supporting your side; this contradicts our sourcing policy. Second, you insert/change facts based on your personal knowledge. This is called original research and is not accepted in Wikipedia articles. I can see you've had some history with the article, but this is not the way to handle a conflict. You're welcome to review our dispute resolution process, or feel free to click this link and leave me a message if I can help with anything. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 18:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

The entire article is original research as there is nothing verfied in the article, yet I have provided two sources to verfify the false nature of the register - page 192 of Matt Neuberg's book Realbasic A Definte guide 2nd edition and anyone;s ability to ask RS. the authors of this article continue to to refuse to check these sources and provide any verfification!

We can't ask RS; this would be considered original research. I've mentioned the book you brought up on the talk page. There are quite a number of sources in the article; you cannot delete them and then claim the article is a piece of unsourced BS. Having used the program for quite some time, I'm positive the article isn't a complete mess, but I do think you're correct about the multi-threading. The way to fix that error is to discuss it on the talk page and calmly explain that your sources (and cite them) say different than the Register article; its certainly possible the article got it wrong. However, deleting the Register article as a reference is simply not acceptable. Please take some time to try to discuss things; there are many people who would be happy to help acquaint you with the way Wikipedia works. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 18:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)