User talk:65.25.24.245

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Thank you for experimenting with the page 69 sex position on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Tony Fox (speak) 22:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at 69 sex position. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GraemeL (talk) 21:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to What would Jesus do?

Your recent edit to What would Jesus do? (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page North Africa on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. FractureTalk   00:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to List of minor characters in the Matrix series. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nilfanion (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Regarding edits made during November 22, 2006 (UTC) to Eric Cartman

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Cpl Syx 15:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Eric Cartman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Cpl Syx 15:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 17 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Cassie Bernall. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 23:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cassie Bernall, you will be blocked from editing. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 23:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cassie Bernall, you will be blocked from editing. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 23:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Cassie Bernall

Your recent edit to Cassie Bernall (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 01:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

It contains hostile wording, and isn't necessarily sourced, as more than just christians continue to allege this. It also doesn't really add anything on to the article that isn't just blame and pushing a hostile point of view, sort of like a person adding a comment like "Unsourced reports from atheist sources continue to back the claim it didn't happen", the current wording does not blame any certain group but still points out the allegation, despite it being a majority opinion within this group it is not the only one that pushes it, so it is considered non-NPOV. Also, please sign your comments using ~~~~ and when adding comments to users, please make a new section in reference to your comment for organizational reasons. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 22:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Purgatory Fubar, you will be blocked for vandalism. --TeckWiz ParlateContribs@ 01:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Purgatory Fubar, you will be blocked from editing. Dave6 talk 02:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] Cassie Bernall

When adding "and presents the reports as fact." with out citation is clearly POV. So I added a Fact tag to that POV Push. After 30 days with out citation that edit will be removed. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 22:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

very fair, and easy enough to cite. after the citation is added, no more reverts will be necessary.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/5/2E/User_talk%7E65.25.24.245.html"