User talk:65.0.104.154

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to YouTube in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source.

Per WP:COPYRIGHT:
External sites can possibly violate copyright. Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of contributory infringement in the United States (Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry). Also, linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors. If the site in question is making fair use of the material, linking is fine.

Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information.
--JoeSmack Talk 03:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Kimbo Slice

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Kimbo Slice, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Oden 12:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] YouTube

The difference between the YouTube video you are linking to (diff) and the video in the article on Michael Richards is that the former is an apparent copyright violation while the latter was uploaded on YouTube by the copyright holder (CBS, see [1]). Linking to copyrighted material on other websites which is used without permission from the copyright holder is not allowed. If you disagree make your argument on the article talk page. However, if you keep on disrupting Wikipedia to make a point you risk being blocked. --Oden 10:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to add something to the talk page.

[edit] External Links

Please stop removing valid further information links from wikipedia. I am reverting every one of your useless edits. Nardman1 01:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Nardman1 01:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for vandalizing multiple articles. Just because you didn't get to have your external link doesn't mean you get to delete other ones. Discuss your actions on article talk pages when your return from the block, or your block will be extended. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't have any external links to add to wikipedia, you moron. Learn what an MFA Made For Adsense spam link is before you comment on my page again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.0.104.154 (talk • contribs).
I have reduced the block to 24 hours, dating from the time of the original block. Please try to be more tactful and civil when working with other users. FCYTravis 02:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm always civil, but I won't be to powertrippers like Zoe who accuse someone of removing blatant ad driven spam links as "vandalism" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.0.104.154 (talk • contribs).
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/5/2E/User_talk%7E65.0.104.154.html"