User talk:64.173.161.162

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 64.173.161.162, is registered to Washington Academy (Sanger, California), and may be shared by multiple users. In the case of organizations using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.

Contents

[edit] May 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rockero 18:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September 2006

Your recent edit to Strategic planning (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Strategic planning (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 16:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Steam rupture (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page The Holocaust on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.Chris Kreider 18:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The edit you made to Isabel Allende (this revision) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. If you are interested in making useful contributions, see the welcome page and the introduction to editing. However, please do not continue to vandalise pages; such edits will be reverted and you will be blocked from further editing – Gurch 21:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jack the Ripper, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 21:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Jack the Ripper, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Philippe Beaudette 21:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 22:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Cynthia page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Citicat 21:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pan Dan 22:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Theodore Roosevelt, you will be blocked. Belovedfreak 20:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Most or all of your edits are vandalism. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia once again, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 22:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to South Park. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 16:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 17:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made 28 March 2007 to Fresno, California

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mbc362 16:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Eliot Ness on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Renrenren 21:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eliot Ness, you will be blocked from editing. — Rebelguys2 talk 21:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of one week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. — Rebelguys2 talk 21:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/4/2E/User_talk%7E64.173.161.162.html"