User talk:64.154.26.251

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do you have link or reference for you edit in David Bronstein? Pavel Vozenilek 19:48, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. Pavel Vozenilek 11:46, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If the above is wrong then change it578 (Yes?) 23:01, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edits to my user page

Please don't edit my comments on my user page. Edits like that are often considered vandalism. If any of the comments on my user page offend you, leave a message on my talk page. For the record, I have traveled outside this country, I don't hate America and I take offense at any suggestion that I do. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 07:16, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Islamic marriage

Hey, It's fine to add information about polygamy but you really need to research the Islamic view more... at best that is sensationalist American media portrayal of Islam. At worst it's anti-Islamic propaganda... Thanks gren 15:49, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] ?

Do you disagree with my statement, or are you being snotty? Derex 05:12, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Test

Test

[edit] Re: Paul Konerko

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. 64.154.26.251 05:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC) aka 216.119.etc. series

[edit] GEwar?

What was your username? I can't figure it out from the posts... are you anthonywhitt?

Thanks for experimenting with the page Jack in the Box on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Where (talk) 02:38, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GEWar, again

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Zanimum 20:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC) (Do not call anyone "thieves", unless they have been charged for theft in a court of law.)

[edit] Edits to String

Thank you for your contributions to the disambiguation page String. However, the information you provided is already included in the links to String (computer science) and String literal. If you would like to add more information, consider contributing directly to the article. Also, disambiguation pages have a general form, which can be seen at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). -- Natalya 18:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pasadena Memorial

Such edits as seen here [1] are not acceptable. Your IP address may be blocked if you fail to stop making joke edits. WhisperToMe 21:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Message from 82.45.250.155

Response to 'nonsensical edits' comment. I realise that I did not fully edit that section. The article contradicts itself, in the factbox it says that 285 people died, whilst in that section in says 296. I checked and found that there were 285 passengers aboard that flight, and 111 people died. I did not however make sure all of the passenger number and death toll figures agreed, something that had already been forgotten.

Just because something is referenced it doesn't mean that it's appropriately placed. I was too lazy to remove the reference. That 'not excluding herself' reads badly, is trivial, and adds nothing to the section. This is a woman who polarizes opinion. Whenever, there is someone or something like this, people try and balance it out with things such as this. The paragraph was not NPOV in the first place, at that little referenced bracket had been added hastily, rather like my edits.

Can I ask why you have been correcting/analysing my edits in a rather systematic manner.

[edit] Your addition of non-notable people to various date pages

Please stop adding non-notable people to the date pages; it is considered vandalism -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] KBR article

Could you please stop using <s> and </s> on the KBR page? If you disagree with the content of said page, either delete the content, or preferably start a discussion on the controversial text in the talk page. Striking out main article text is not the way to do things; this is supposed to be an encyclopaedia, and you certainly wouldn't expect to see struck out text in Britannica! While I agree that the 1st text I moved from the article to the talk page was out of place, a broken link to a reference in the last case (I reverted your edit) doesn't call for a strike out or text removal. Carre 15:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Christmas carol, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/4/2E/User_talk%7E64.154.26.251.html"