User talk:63.80.194.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Is someone else in this building using Wikipedia? -- Guy sitting next to an emergency exit.

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Moline, Illinois. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Dakota ~ ° 20:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

what?? what nonsense? be specific!

You should use the sandbox to test your edits if you don't want them to be flagged. Simply clicking the "bold" button without highlighting any text brings in a Bold text, for example, and other buttons put in similar placeholders which are common pieces of vandalism. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

That's good to know, I guess, but you have reverted every single change I made to the Moline page, and I must tell you that I added significant value to that entry. You are not looking before you leap, and to call my efforts nonsense or vandalism simply because I violated a procedural rule... seems nonsensical to me. After all, is the Wikipedia about information or analretentive adherence to rules? Sorry, no offense, but you have disregarded a significant amount of my effort for a item of administrivia.

Now that we have agreed that my edits were flagged as vandalism in error, I assume you will return my changes to the Moline page, correct?

Once again I must ask that you acknowledge that you flagged my edits in error and return my changes to the Moline page, or at least repond to me. I have been patient but in the meantime I've been researching the wiki dispute resolution steps. I would rather not travel down that path with you but as we both know you acted in haste and all I ask is that you return my work to the Moline page. I admit I am not a administrative expert and if an action on my behalf raised a flag on your end, I sincerly regret it, but if you had simply looked at the content I was developing rather than hastily assuming everying was nonsense or vandalism, and removing all of it... none of this would be an issue. Again, I am only asking that you do the right thing. --coreyjahns@gmail.com

Contents

[edit] Trolling

Please stop trolling. If you have a valid request to make of me, please make it. I don't have time for the veiled complaints or whatever these are, and I quite frankly don't know what you want me to do about them. I don't know who you are or what I've apparently done to you, but disrupting Wikipedia won't get you what you want. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


I admire your attempts to fight back against the power mad wikipedophiles which rule this website with an iron fist (however futile they may be). I personally saw nothing wrong with your edits. As always, when confronted with a mistake, a wikipedophile will always play the troll card. 68.69.194.125 01:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

Regarding your last message on my talk page, I don't appreciate being called a "power mad wikipedophile" or whatever else you choose to attribute to me. Further personal attacks will result in an immediate block. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Eskog, I hope you see this but I'm not sure if this is the right way to reach you or not. In any event, you are incorrect in assuming that I called you a power mad wikipedophile. For the record, if I had said it, I would admit it -- but I did not say it. I frankly don't have any love lost for you as you w/o any thought removed a lot of work and effort on my part when you reverted my efforts on another page (simply because I stepped on a silly admin rule), but I have only attributed the "name" to you of wiki admin overlord, as I don't know what else to call you. I have a beef with you, but I have never called you any name. For what its worth...

[edit] More attacks

For your edit to Talk:Moline, Illinois, you have been blocked for 48 hours. Your trolling, incivility, and insults have no place here, and I hope you will find something more constructive to do on-wiki when your block expires. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lost template

This template works perfectly fine! It is made for Lost, as said up the top, and should therefore not have other shows added to it (especially The Simpsons, which has about a gazillion episodes). Please leave it alone unless you are adding a new Lost episode. -- SilvaStorm

What do you have against this? It's working fine, and will do for a long long time! It would only break if it had as many episodes as the Simpsons! Why do you insist on keeping it marked for deletion?! -- SilvaStorm
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/3/2E/User_talk%7E63.80.194.19.html"