User talk:63.167.255.231

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello 63.167.255.231 Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! JDtalk 18:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

[edit] Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim

Please review Wikipedia's policy regarding verifiability. In particular, note the first and second sections which make clear the if you are adding information to the article (e.g. your "most fans" claim) then the burden of evidence is on you to cite reliable sources to back up that claim. You have been asked several times to cite a source for your edit and you have failed to do so. You are being uncooperative and unconstructive to repeatedly include the information without sources, in clear defiance of Wikipedia policy as outlined in the links above.

If you'd like to elevate this to dispute resolution, that is fine. But if that's the route you'd like to take, then let's go ahead and initiate it rather than your continuing to just revert war over it, please.

Thanks! Mwelch 00:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reliable source

Your recent edit to Jennifer Aniston was reverted. Please read WP:RS so you can understand what constitutes a reliable source. Thanks. --Yamla 17:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Wendy Wu: Homecoming Warrior:

Your recent edit to Wendy Wu: Homecoming Warrior (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 05:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reliable sources

Please read WP:RS. Ditl.org, while pretty, is not a reliable source. --EEMeltonIV 04:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim again

Would you please STOP adding the Dodgers reference back into the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim page? I'm not really sure why you're doing this. Perhaps you're just not reading the edit summaries on the page's history. If that is the case, then please start reading the edit summaries on pages to which you want to make changes. This is especially important if you make a change and see later that your change has been reverted. Oftentimes, viewing the edit summary of the reversion will tell you the reason that it was reverted. In this case, both another editor and I have told you in those summaries (numerous times now, in fact) that the Dodgers no longer refer to the team as the Anaheim Angels, and we've pointed you to the evidence that demonstrates this.

If you have read the edit summaries and seen this information from us, but you keep reverting anyway in order to just be difficult, then please stop that as well. We would definitely appreciate a greater spirit of cooperation from you than that.

Furthermore, it would be very helpful if you not only read a page's edit summaries, but also actually provide an edit summary yourself when you do make a change. We'd all very much appreciate that, as well.

Thanks! Mwelch 02:39, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

OK, I can see you're still at it, so obviously that answers the question. You just enjoy being difficult and uncooperative. Mwelch 09:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Incomplete AFD

You seem to have attempted to nominate Al Gore III for deletion for what would have been the 6th time, but it appears that you didn't complete the process and create a listing on the AFD page. That is probably why there were no unvotes. Robert A.West (Talk) 22:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]