User talk:62.78.196.15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 15:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removed from archive page

I have reverted your edits to Talk:Evolution/Archive 017. As you might have guessed, it is an archive. Please do not edit archives.

"Is the origin of Red Rain fully explained? Are the origins of nanobes studied and explained? Or what about the origin of some organelles in living cells? What about subterranean bacteria living in bedrock? All I propose is inserting the factual conditional to the statement all - Revise it to all known and studied. can you supply an alternative explanation? - Yes, the structures commonly shared are optimal - efficiency/complexity/probability/survivability wise - permitting life (in this environment with the mineral composition and average solar input of planet Earth). Furthermore, as long as we can't define the quality of proto-life or how it came to being the assertion that all modern lifeforms share a common ancestor is utterly meaningless unless we also make the distinction between the common ancestor and origin of life - As the common ancestor wasn't necessarily the first, or last, life to appear (heck, the common ancestor could've very well been an amalgam of species from that era) - just the one that eventually grew dominating. It's also important to notice that we have no way of studying the exact genetic or cellular structure of vast majority of extinct species. - G3, 02:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)"

-- Ec5618 08:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pluto

"largest observed body directly orbiting" - original ver has "directly" inluded, but some "pluto purists" removed it. But phrasing "10th largest known body directly orbiting Sun" would be even better... GrzegorzWu 09:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Can't figure out why???

So is there a reason you don't sign your posts with a normal user account? You use "G3", yet there's no link, and in looking at the diff, this is the user account that's being used. Are you hiding something? Or do you not know how to sign up? Just curious. Orangemarlin 17:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)