User talk:60.234.65.67

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --NaconKantari 05:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:17, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Excuse me?

Excuse me? What I saw you do was clearly a biased statement. Perhaps being blocked once was not enough? I would like to know how deleting your statement was "unpatriotic behavior". How is it not a bias? "The Iraq War is a disaster." Sounds biased to me. I am sorry that you lost your friend in the war, but that does not mean that the war was a disaster. How was what you said the truth? How do I have a lack of intelligence? I deleted a statement that was clearly biased. And I find it completely innapropriate that you are saying I have a "holier than thou" attitude and that I "lack intelligence".

Please, if we're going to get into an argument, back up your opinions with facts instead of pointlessly flaming me, and leave your biases out of it. If you make a statement on my user page like that again, I will ask for them to block you again. bob rulz 05:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

And once again, the pointless hate mail. I have looked through your edits, and all of them are vandalism. I'm not even going to deal with somebody who is as blatantly direspectful as you have been to me. bob rulz 06:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
How Dare you accuse me of vandalism. It is you that should back up your arguments with facts. What gives you the right to determine what is correct and what is not? Sounds Like someone has a God complex to me. When you have as much Life experience as I do Then and only then can you even approach understanding an argument with me Grow Up. You have repeatedly Harassed me I will not stand for it I am not only reporting you to the Wikipedia Admin I am also gathering info for a news story About the unreliabilty of Wikipedia due to the input from user such as yourself. Thank You for you continued help Jason.
Let's take this statement by statement shall we?
"How dare you accuse me of vandalism" Do you not know the definiton of vandalism? At one point you repeatedly put "Wikipedia, tHe free encyclopedia!" on a number of pages, blanking them in the process. Yes, it is a free encyclopedia, but if you want to use it, don't abuse it.
"It is you that should back up your arguments with facts." How am I not? It was vandalism. Fairly clear vandalism to me.
"Sounds like someone has a God complex to me." Sounds that way to me too. That person is you. You are acting incredibly arrogant and disrespectful. You're just trying to divert attention to yourself and waste my time. I feel like wasting my time, because to me, putting someone like you in your place (even if you're 40 years old) seems like fun to me.
"when you have as much life experience as me." Sounds like I already do. You do realize that with both your grammar and your attidue that you sound like an ignorant, bitter 12 year old junior high schooler?
"then and only then can you even approach understanding an argument with me." Oh, I understand it perfectly. It's less of an argument and more bitter, biased, angry flaming at comments that are not even meant to insult you.
"Grow up." Look who's talking.
"You have repeatedly harrased me." I believe that it is you who have harrased me.
"I will not stand for it and I am not only reporting you to the Wikipedia admin" Go ahead. Good luck making your case to them. They've given you a warning, and not me. Not a good start for you, is it?
"I am also gathering info for a news story about the unreliability of Wikipeida due to the input from users such as yourself." Go ahead. It's already been proven that Wikipedia is as reliable a source of information as Brittanica. You are the one that is contributing lies, biases, and misinformation to this encyclopedia (as well as pointless vandalism). Most of the people here are level-headed, good-mannered, willing to help other people out, and willing to contribute helpful and correct information to an encyclopedia. We enjoy doing this. You just enjoy vandalizing it.
"Thank you for your continued help Jason." You're quite welcome. Always a pleasure to help the people who actually want information from a free encyclopedia. bob rulz 21:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Turkish people, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --pgk(talk) 14:12, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


This is regarding your edit to the article Panini (scholar). Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 21:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/0/2E/User_talk%7E60.234.65.67.html"