Talk:3 March 2007 lunar eclipse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I don't think a separate article is needed- in no way it is an exceptional occurence of the lunar eclipse and so all the details could easily be included in the main article.
- I'm inclined to agree, but as of 00:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC) it's not even over yet! Peter Grey 00:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I do think we should have a page on it. I came to find information on this specific eclipse. But I've already said this in the AfD nomination. Korinkami 09:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I do think that a total eclipse is worth a dedicated article, to display specific information on the event that could hardly be displayed in the main article on lunar eclipses. Also take a look at this suggestion I posted to improve the quality of the article with better pictures. --DarTar 10:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of lunar eclipses
I began work on a list of lunar eclipses, using the same format as the list of solar eclipses. So far it only contains the two 2007 eclipses, but there are 228 more this century and there are another 230 from the 20th century that we may want to include. Please place further discussion on the article's talk page. ··· rWd · Talk ··· 08:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD
Shouldn't there be a template with the archive to the AfD discussion on this page? It seems to me that such a template makes it far less likely that someone else will come along and delete it. Sincerely, your friendly nominator for deletion in this last instance, IvoShandor 08:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- I like how no one answers. Pretty cool. IvoShandor 16:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)