User talk:271828182
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Heidegger
Excellent rewrite of the introduction! I looked at this article a few days ago and noted how gawd-aweful it was. You have made it intelligible. Thank you. Zeusnoos 13:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A/A & C
Sure thing. Thanks for asking for my opinion. CHE 22:34, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
No need for thanks on the AfD for that article. But you might be interested in commenting on its deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 January 17. I hope you'll continue to patrol and clean up the often nonsensical additions to Wikipedia's continental-philosophy articles – it's a big job. -- Rbellin|Talk 17:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Want to make a difference?
Language: http://uh.edu/~psaka/IEPlist.htm
Logic: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~klement/IEP/desired_logic_articles.txt
History of Analytic: http://www.malone.edu/2909
Continental: http://www.utas.edu.au/philosophy/staff_research/reynolds/IEParticles.html (note that existentialism and Bergson are already reserved, articles such as *Deleuze* could be suggested to JR)
Epistemology: http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jbeebe2/DesiredIEP.htm —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zeusnoos (talk • contribs) 22:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] RfC on Lucas
I am gathering evidence against Lucas, who is proving a 'difficult editor' for a number of us. I have started a page here. This includes most of his recent edits, but nothing on his articles that sadly ended up as cases for deletion. Anyone with suitable diffs, please put them there, or on my talk page. Let's clear up this town once and for all. Dbuckner 12:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RFC
Please comment at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/ForrestLane42. — goethean ॐ 15:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Good edits
On Analytic philosophy. I'd almost forgotten what those felt like. And splendid work on the problem editors page. I hadn't realised it had gone on so long. Dbuckner 19:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Moving to Citizendium
Hi #27. I am almost certainly moving to Citizendium. There's a good community there, a number of good philosophers, and (apart from some questions I have as to whether the Ludvikus problem could theoretically occur there) seems a good home. I would very much welcome your involvement. Your writing is first class, and you have a firm grasp of areas of philosophy I have never even approached. Let me know if you have any questions about login &c. It really has got too mad here. Dbuckner 08:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] OK not moving yet
I checked Citizendium out, and there is no one there - yet. Meanwhile, thanks for the support on the philosophy page. I see you are still having to revert the analytic/continental nonsense.
Did you say you were planning work on the continental philosophy section? I'll support you on that. I'm not an expert, but can provide tail-gunning work and trench-digging and call air-strikes from time to time. Best Dbuckner 10:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hegel
Note the 'dubious claim' was not mine! I left the material about Hegel in as I don't know the subject. Do check over any of the rest. Thanks. I note it mentions 'absolute idealism' without any explanation of what it is. edward (buckner) 08:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Continental philosophy
I liked the new introduction. Good work. And now I need to look at the Analytic philosophy article! edward (buckner) 12:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Early Modern Philosophy
Phew - thanks. edward (buckner) 19:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
