User talk:24.64.64.218

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user talk page has been protected from editing by new or unregistered users to prevent 24.64.64.218 (talkcontribsblock logauto) from introducing vandalism to it. (Administrators, please remember to add the user to Wikipedia:List of protected pages#Protected user pages.)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Izehar (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SoLando (Talk) 18:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SoLando (Talk) 18:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. SoLando (Talk) 18:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

Cloning article

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. David D. (Talk) 16:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango123 (e) 20:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Shanel § 20:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sango123 (e) 20:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Sango123 (e) 20:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Lady's maid. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Travelbird 16:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

September 12th

Regarding your edit to Canmore, Alberta, Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Qyd 17:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to the Smiley and the Canmore, Alberta articles are vandalism. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Elpoca 16:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Your Edits to Canmore, Alberta

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Qyd 16:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Mak (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

October 2006

Your edit to Marine Otter

Your recent edit to Marine Otter (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Skull, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Solipsist 14:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Vsmith 17:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Final warning

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism to Iridium will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Khukri (talk . contribs) 21:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to List of fatal bear attacks in North America by decade

Your recent edit to List of fatal bear attacks in North America by decade (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Alcoholism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Qyd 15:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stephenb (Talk) 15:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Scarlett the cat on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp 15:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 1 month. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Alphachimp 15:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Featured article review. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. LibLord 18:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Happiness

Your recent edit to Happiness (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


This is your final warning. The next time you vandalize you will be blocked again for a very long time. Academic Challenger 22:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 22:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Musket. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Mschel 15:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Stephen Harper. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. LukeSurl 20:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice