User talk:24.60.161.63

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey 24.60.151.63. I wanted to talk to you about something Well i saw your edits and i dont really agree with them. Like about Guam I have never heard such a thing. Please get back to me. Thanks. (XGustaX 22:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC))

Agreed

I dont Agree with you on that statement sorry. (24.60.161.63 20:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC))

Contents

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against repeated reversion of articles after warnings. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

[edit] February 27, 2006

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you.  — TheKMantalk 20:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: The sources are there

Thanks for your information. --OneEuropeanHeart 22:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] White

If you think thsat the section on Latin America is insufficiently nuanced, make it more so. Do not just delete an entire block of texy thatr is fully footnoted. This does not improve the article. Paul B 02:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:AN/3RR

Do you have an explanation for this? SlimVirgin (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Can you help me watch over a page?

First of all, please don't remove content at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard as you did here, that kind of edits can easily earn you a permanent block. According to this source and this the Chilean population is clearly 93% Mestizo, this does not contradict the CIA WFB information, but if you disagree you can talk with Al-Andalus, discuss it at the talk page, or contact a neutral administrator. This is a common content dispute and not vandalism so I can't protect the page or block Al-Andalus. Hope this helps. --OneEuropeanHeart 00:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bad sources

Your reply at talk:Swedish language is, to say the least, bizarre. If you read both the wikipedia article and all of the text in the source you cited and compare them, you'd have to be illiterate not to see the similarities in choice of facts, structure and even grammar. Some sentences are identical to ones that are still in our article. The only difference is that your source has removed some info and is based on older versions. I've been working on Swedish language for over a year now, so I know what I'm talking about. You're only embarassing yourself if you keep up this behavior.

Peter Isotalo 01:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay well you don't need to give me an attuitude about it. I just know for a fact there are Swedish speakers in Argentina. I am after all a Swedish-Argentine and my family speaks Swedish. Instead of shooting me down you could have tried to help me it is called being nice.  :(24.60.161.63 02:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC))
I apologize if you feel insulted, but you've shown quite poor judgement about this. I welcome information about any Swedish-speaking minority in the article, but I want it to be reliable. If you're serious about this, I can recommend searching for Swedish-Argentine or Swedish-Brazilian friendship unions and similar organizations. They should have at least some information about how big the Swedish-speaking communities in South America actually are.
Peter Isotalo 10:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Guarani in Corrientes

Please, don't remove perfectly sourced information. No matter how unimportant Guarani language might seam to you in Corrientes Province, it has been named official. You have been already blocked for vandalism before, so behaviour such as this might lead to future blocking without further notice. Mariano(t/c) 08:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Argentina

If you so much as remove a comma from the Demographics section of Argentina again without justification, I will block you. You've been warned enough already. Don't do this anymore. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings from your own talk page is also vandalism. Strike two. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 10:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ---- Where 16:31, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


Please stop vandalizing pages you will be block if you proceed. Thank you (XGustaX 16:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC))

No it wasnt a racist word. It is not pejorative. Wy are you so sensitive?--Guzman ramirez 09:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/4/2E/User_talk%7E24.60.161.63.html"