User talk:24.211.192.250

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] ISP info

OrgName:    Road Runner HoldCo LLC
OrgID:      RRMA
Address:    13241 Woodland Park Road
City:       Herndon
StateProv:  VA
PostalCode: 20171
Country:    US

ReferralServer: rwhois://ipmt.rr.com:4321

NetRange:   24.208.0.0 - 24.211.255.255
CIDR:       24.208.0.0/14
NetName:    RR-CENTRAL-3BLK
NetHandle:  NET-24-208-0-0-1
Parent:     NET-24-0-0-0-0
NetType:    Direct Allocation
NameServer: DNS1.RR.COM
NameServer: DNS2.RR.COM
NameServer: DNS3.RR.COM
NameServer: DNS4.RR.COM
Comment:    ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
RegDate:    2001-06-29
Updated:    2003-02-04

RTechHandle: ZS30-ARIN
RTechName:   ServiceCo LLC
RTechPhone:  +1-703-345-3416
RTechEmail:  abuse@rr.com

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE10-ARIN
OrgAbuseName:   Abuse
OrgAbusePhone:  +1-703-345-3416
OrgAbuseEmail:  abuse@rr.com

OrgTechHandle: IPTEC-ARIN
OrgTechName:   IP Tech
OrgTechPhone:  +1-703-345-3416
OrgTechEmail:  abuse@rr.com

[edit] April 2006

Charges against Orhan Pamuk are not brought by government. In Turkey charges are brought by Prosecutors which are independent of government.

Please don't remove TAT link. Why are you afraid of it so much?

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --digital_me(Talk)(Contribs) 23:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Armenian Genocide. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. —Khoikhoi 05:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Armenian Genocide. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. John Smith's 17:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey, you would have broken the rule first. Glad to see you saw reason. And I've contributed to the discussion plenty of times. I'm just fed up of repeating myself over and over again because Turkish nationalists can't accept their country did anything wrong. John Smith's 19:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Jesus, did I say you were a Turkish nationalist?! I said I was tired of saying the same thing over and over on the talk page because of such people. I have been debating this issue for God-knows how long on wikipedia, and when you think you've finally sorted the page out, some new trolls come along to wreck it by crying wolf over the NPOV policy.
I'm sorry if I offended you, but you'll have to understand how stressed most of us that want to talk about the truth are, Fadix especially. John Smith's 19:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] On the word "terrorist"

Please see Wikipedia:Words to avoid. Note the following:

Not encyclopedic:

       * X is a terrorist group.
       * Y, leader of the X terrorists, ...
       * After a rapid military response, the X terrorists abandoned the hostages.

Hope this helps :) - FrancisTyers 21:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, I understand. Hope that you checked their lie about the dynamic IP.24.211.192.250 23:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry

I'm sorry for edit waring with you. To be honest, I know the PKK is a terrorist organization as well, but I also know that it would violate NPOV by labeling them as such at Wikipedia. Once again, I'm sorry. —Khoikhoi 23:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok, fair enough 24.211.192.250 23:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cheap tactics revelaed

You may want to read some of the cheap tactics confessed by Fadix and THOTH [1] :) 24.211.192.250 18:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi, What am I supposed to be looking for? Can you clarify what you mean by "cheap tactics"? --Cat out 20:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

THOTH speaking to Fadix: "... However, in times past, I have refused to make certain posts (that you scripted for me - etc) under different usernames to support your positions as you requested of me - and I have this documented...as well as other similar things... I am sorry that this has made you upset - that I have not proven as mallable as you wished - though I have cooperated on some things - haven't I? (nothing deceptive however - as I don't go for all of this silly personal intrigue). Shall I go on or shall I just introduce this evidence into your proceedings?"

Fadix speaking to THOTH: "...You're being childishtic, two times I have been requesting things involving the creation of usernames, recent one was implying what I needed a Turk to do(that part was an indirect request to that other person, as far as I know you don't know Turkish), and you know what happened, a Turk offered to help me(and I hope you are respectful enought to keep that persons identity private). Two Wikipedian members are aware of the situation and know why I did that, and another veteran, also administrator El_C who I said about the email I recieved during the period was warned by me about the situation which I considered premedited. I needed to know who was doing that and the only way for me to know was a Turk registering and supporting me so that the responsable email that person and so I accumulate that evidence(implicated with Tommiks cases) during the RfAr I was planing at that time forcing the responsable to come clean privatly(I know it wasn't clean, I admit) by email and retreaving that evidence. But I forgot to say that Turk to have a valid email and that person didn't had much time so I didn't wanted to bother that person(if you visit that registered users talkpage(the one you were witness of what I requested that person to say), you will read my past request about having a valid email) so I settled for a checkuser for that time being, which was refused. Either way, that person was really a Turk and was really supporting me, while this was durty, you can't use this, since it isen't against any policies or guidelines, and I admit that it was also motivated by the need of gaining some support against later, the IP unregistered users. " 24.211.192.250 20:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Thats a copy of the msg posted on the page you linked. What part of it is "cheep tactic"? I just don't want to jump to conclusions as both sides (Fadix THOTH) are ranting on... --Cat out 20:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, I'm not sure what you consider appropriate. But Fadix requesting THOTH to create different usernames, and asking to post messages scripted by himself under these 'fake' usernames does not sound normal to me.
Similarly, Fadix trying to find a Turkish speaking user to manipulate the talk page is not innocent. Anyway, this is FYI only. I'm not planning to pursue anything out of this. Best 24.211.192.250 21:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know. --Cat out 21:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Persian

Please don't remove all references to people being Persian without any explanation / sourcing. I almost blocked you for vandalism but then decided to place this on WP:ANB/I. Please stop or at least discuss this on talk pages. gren グレン 04:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re edit on AG

Well if you look at Angus's history its difficult to assume good faith. All I am saying here is the text should be reworded but the number of scolars should remain the same, they are all good!

[edit] RE

I figured this out, but by going around removing the guys add-ins on each of his contributions, you are hounding him. It is not OK to track a particular users edits.

As for the edit, I agree, probably the term opposion fit best there, not because the word denial is POV, but because there is not only the word genocide in the genocide, and it is not because one disagree with its uses, that that person deny any other componments of the event. Lewis in the 80s, still maintained the 1-1.5 million range for the number of victims even if he made a 180 degree turn during the same years. Fad (ix) 17:38, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3rr

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- Karl Meier 18:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Could you please stop following me around, and please stop trolling on my userpage? -- Karl Meier 18:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:POINT

Greetings, it appears that you have disrupted Wikipedia to illustrate a point on Religion of Peace. If this message is in error please accept my apologies but if not then please use an article or project's talk page to make your point. Thanks! From: Netscott 18:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


I can only do it after 4:00 (which means tomorrow because i will sleep soon) or it wil be 3 revet rule violation and i will be banned for a day.neurobio 00:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

i did a change on 04:28, 4 July 2006 and then 2 more so I should wait until 04:28, 5 July 2006. Am I wrong? I may be wrong...neurobio 00:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

gee now i see the benefit of saying "who will read all these stuf"neurobio 00:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I also think that you should get a username. no matter how stupid it is generally admins aproach suspicious to anons. as you wish ofcourseneurobio 22:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

what is the efficent way to do a full revert? should i copy paste the old article fully?

this was also the case for the first pic where Russians were standing in front of the dead but fadix claims that armenians are also circumcised. I dont know.also this photo is well documented by aren wenger?? still who knows?

I totaly agree see "I have removed the first picture" section in the discussion. I cant think of any source to validate that knowledgeneurobio 00:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

up to now i could not find a single thing that says armenians were circumcised. actually it is refered as a kind of torture after conversion to islam in every "genocide" page. Again an incredible claim with no sources but we have to take his word.neurobio 21:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

you mean in the history. I know today they are doing that especially in US. but in the ottoman empire i still doubt that.

have you seen that User:Fadix/evidencepage/Holdwater. I have never seen such an obsesed person in my life. funny thing is he still thinks Deep and Holdwater are the same person. I am having so much fun reading these and he is so sure. poor guy :) strange that he always makes jokes about being schizo. well i know he is going to be correct one day just claim every one is Holdwater and one day bingo you got him.neurobio 20:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/4/2E/User_talk%7E24.211.192.250.html"