User talk:24.184.2.48

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Istro-Romanians

This edit with no summary or citation doesn't seem right to me. It changed a late split from Daco-Romanian to a late split from Proto-Romanian. This is a drastic change of meaning. Obviously, all Eastern Romanca languages go back to Proto-Romanian. But the previous assertion was that Istro-Romanian had a longer history in common with Daco-Romanian, what is now typically called just Romanian. Presumably, by the time they split, there was no Proto-Romanian to split from. At the very least, this is an uncited, significant change in what the article says. Khoikhoi 00:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aromanians

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Aromanians are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! Khoikhoi 02:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/4/2E/User_talk%7E24.184.2.48.html"