User talk:218.186.9.3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 218.186.9.3, is registered to StarHub (Singapore) and may be shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

However, you might still be unable to edit Wikipedia if the IP you are using is blocked due to a MediaWiki "feature". In such a case you could request to be unblocked.

In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact StarHub (Singapore) to report network abuse.


Contents

[edit] September 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Celtic mythology on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 10:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Keep comments on the validity of sources to the discussion or history pages, not on the main page.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.202.98 (talk • contribs).

[edit] Jessica Rose

Firstly, prove that is her myspace, and second, a link to someone's personal myspace is not appropriate for wikipedia, it has aboslutely no informational value about lonelygirl15

[edit] Naomi Robson

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Naomi Robson, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- Longhair 03:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tangotango 03:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Longhair 03:34, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

-- Longhair 03:34, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Ensis. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Konstable 09:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Calvin Cheng

Your recent edit to Calvin Cheng (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during September 20, 2006 (UTC) to Seven Wonders of the World

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 11:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Theme Hospital on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 19:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "Dynamic proxy server shared by thousands of Singaporean users."


Decline reason: "Please create an account. --WinHunter (talk) 08:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

[edit] October 2006

[edit] Regarding edits made during October 1, 2006 (UTC) to Cricket

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 08:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Hwa Chong Institution, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:24, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Anglo-Chinese School (Independent). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to North Korea, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Raymond Arritt 16:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to United Nations, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Raymond Arritt 18:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during October 8, 2006 (UTC) to Chinese martial arts

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 05:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during October 8, 2006 (UTC) to Jackie Chan

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 09:16, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Beverly Cleary

Your recent edit to Beverly Cleary (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Nishkid64 14:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in CAcert.org. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Leuko 22:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Defense of the Ancients

Thank you for experimenting with the page Defense of the Ancients on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. x42bn6 Talk 19:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

[edit] Guam radio

Do not delete the template. Robert Moore 06:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Golden Globe Award

This is your last warning.
The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Trödel 16:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during November 7, 2006 (UTC) to Superkick

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Chris Kreider 12:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Longhair\talk 13:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

-- Longhair\talk 13:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

unblock-auto|1=218.186.9.3|2=Vandalism, repeat offender

You are not autoblocked, you are blocked for vandalism and this is a valid block and will not be lifted. Gwernol 17:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Failure. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 03:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] December 2006

[edit] Regarding edits made during December 1, 2006 (UTC) to Microsoft

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Rrv1988 02:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for repeated vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires – Gurch 14:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding blocking

Instead of blocking users, can't the pages that are frequently vandalised(eg. Microsoft, Windows) simply be locked so that only registered/authorised users can edit them? Leave the talk page open so that anonymous users can still post suggestions of what to add to the page, to be reviewed by registered users. I feel that this would be a far less frustrating solution to the problem of "anonymous" vandals and over-zealous blockers.

[edit] Blocked

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "I have a wireless network and I have no intention of vandalising any webpages on Wikipedia. There may be some who share the same IP address. I know nothing about the vandalism, nor do I know which page I have 'vandalised'. A message also showed that I had created 6 accounts in 24 hours, which I definitely did not."


Decline reason: "This is an anonymous-only block, which means you can register an account and edit through it with no problems. Unfortunately, too many people utilize this IP and some vandalize pages with it. We apologize for any inconvenience.—Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 08:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
You can't create an account if you are blocked, anonymous-only or not. --218.186.9.3 14:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during December 8, 2006 (UTC) to Gourav Dhiman

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Bart133 (t) (c) 19:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] account

Thanks for providing the rationales to the images. Please register an account and edit being logged in. There are many compelling reasons to do so. TIA, --Irpen 07:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Howard the Duck 11:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] your edits to Portrait of Home

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chensiyuan 13:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to SuChin Pak

Your recent edit to SuChin Pak (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

Your recent edit to Total refraction (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to I Belong to Me:

Your recent edit to I Belong to Me (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 10:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

I am sorry that my correction to Augustus was wrong. However, it does not merit a "vandalism" tag. Please do not think that I am so free as to go around vandalising. Do not generalise and discriminate against IP addresses please. --218.186.9.3 15:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I do not do either. But something like that has happened to me once, so I understand. To avoid errors like this in the future, please consider registering (it's free, you don't need to use your real name, and it takes just few seconds to do).--Barbatus 17:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
On the other hand, this edit is vandalism. If it continues, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade 04:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Seraphimblade 04:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 2 weeks as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 05:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
2 weeks block is a soft block. Congratulations on your reading abilities (or failure to do so). No sarcasm intended in the previous statements. 2 weeks block for about 500 000 - 4 000 000 people after just 1 page-blanking... How did you ever pass your RFA? --218.186.9.3 11:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Why am i blocked! my brother did it. stupid brother...PLz unblock me...i have contributions to make

[edit] February 2007

[edit] Your edit to Glossary of ballet

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Glossary of ballet. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  H4cksaw  (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Billboard Hot 100. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - RJASE1 06:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Most common words in English. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Proton Waja, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Big Brother 1984 09:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit to California Gold Rush

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Ronbo76 14:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to DNA, you will be blocked from editing. TimVickers 18:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Fat feminism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer 05:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Sales, you will be blocked. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Davidkazuhiro 15:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made to Kyoko Hasegawa

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 218.186.9.3! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \.photobucket\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 03:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made 26 February 2007 to Daniel Radcliffe

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Rettetast 09:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Unity Secondary School. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Prolog 07:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] March 2007

[edit] Regarding edits made 4 March 2007 to Sleight of hand

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. 84.49.149.1 10:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Goods and Services Tax (Singapore):

Your recent edit to Goods and Services Tax (Singapore) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 11:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to D-Cyber

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to D-Cyber. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Mschel 15:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Dust Bowl on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote 12:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Dust Bowl on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Prolog 12:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Junk Rig. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote 12:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Regarding edits made during March 12, 2007 (UTC) to President of China

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Myanw 11:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to World Trade Center, you will be blocked from editing. Real96 09:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to World Trade Center, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 09:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for chronic vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. John Reaves (talk) 09:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

John Reaves (talk) 09:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)