User talk:216.11.222.21/Archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] March 2006
- Sorry, not going to happen. These warnings stay here, and if the entire Novi Community School District cannot control the people vandalizing Wikipedia then the entire Novi Community School District can wait until they get home to contribute positively. Blocking doesn't keep them from reading the articles. --Syrthiss 17:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's kind of stupid to just say that about it (and a bit touch rude), since the only way that those idiots can control a website's abuse is to block it. They block everything on Dweebsense and don't really care about whatever else happens otherwise. Also, it's not just that, it's also that in the after-school program, people use the computers, and since all the games are blocked, they just, probably, vandalise Wiki out of boredom. Whatever, I have to work with Dweebsense everyday and I could rant for an entire 75GB on it, but I don't have the time, nor is this the right site. Hehehe. Websense-ed in Wisconsin
-
- PS. Since most vandals don't even know there are user pages and whatnot, you can't go to your IP address's page if you're not logged in, you have to check history of an article that you just changed...complicated. I'm sure nobody doing this even knows about these. Is there a way to display a message saying "WTF mates, stop vandalising" when you access the Wiki on that IP? There should be... I agree that people chould stop doing this to my homeland, but they don't even know. Any help?
[edit] May 2006
-
- The real problem here is a public school policy that grants its students unmonitored access to the Internet. What would you do if one of your computer users started making terroristic threats? While this type of access may be common, it's irresponsible and it's correctible. Just have your uses log in as themselves so misdeeds can be traced back to them. You may well find a significant decrease in irresponsible computer user by doing so. You'll certainly be able to respond faster if someone actually starts using your systems for illegal purposes. I doubt your students are permitted to attend class anonymously. You should not make an exception with your computer system, either. Rklawton 18:16, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm trying strongly to resist calling you something and getting myself banned. A public school policy that grants students unmonitored access in not what's going on here. Most of the time teachers don't let anyone use the computer. The only thing they watch for is wanton blood, and also pr@wn. If you're typing something in, they won't care what it is...besides, they can't check it. They are under the illusion that almighty Websense is the guardian, and that they ned not do anything about it...I don't blame them. Teachers are supposed to monitor each and every student's typing at all times? Seriously? Flameviper12 14:30, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- The real problem here is a public school policy that grants its students unmonitored access to the Internet. What would you do if one of your computer users started making terroristic threats? While this type of access may be common, it's irresponsible and it's correctible. Just have your uses log in as themselves so misdeeds can be traced back to them. You may well find a significant decrease in irresponsible computer user by doing so. You'll certainly be able to respond faster if someone actually starts using your systems for illegal purposes. I doubt your students are permitted to attend class anonymously. You should not make an exception with your computer system, either. Rklawton 18:16, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
This is not a warning not to vandalise...it in fact is but that's beside the point. This edit was made by a person at your own school. Please stop this. You might think that it doesn't hurt anyone, but it does. Really. Administrators, who I know from experience are levelheaded and kind, must spend hours reverting pointless nonsense, and they are fed up with this vandalism. I really wish for someone here to contribute finely, and I believe that you should be able to do that and not be spoiled by the idiots who continue to destroy this encyclopaedia. Please. create an account and contribute positively. I'm sure you'll find the wiki markup system interesting and fun. You might even be able to create a good article.
- Sincerely, One of your Own
- 14:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Leonardo da Vinci. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Budgiekiller 14:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This refers to your edits to Korean War, Alger Hiss and Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, amongst others. David Underdown 12:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Wal-Mart was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to KISS (band) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:216.11.222.21, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David Underdown 13:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] June 2006
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Paul Cézanne, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Stumps 15:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Polar region was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 12:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Tangotango 16:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Wal-Mart was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Ironically you're edit regarding Kyle Korver, in which you've asserted he used to say the phrase "you got owned", will result in your banning. Then you'll be owned. --203.214.88.244 16:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to League Island. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Travelbird 12:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Bangladesh, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Travelbird 12:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page Oprah Winfrey on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 14:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] August 2006
Thank you for experimenting with the page James Bond 007: Agent Under Fire on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Canadian-Bacon (contribs) 16:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to July 25, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ale_Jrb 14:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Due to vandalism, you have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. — FireFox (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2006
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. While ICP may very well live in Novi, the format this information was entered in seems to be yet another sign of vandalism coming from this address. There have been enough warnings. Kevin 18:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] September 2006
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Gwernol 13:49, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Wiki (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Gwernol. It may be seen as vandalism. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 14:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to target users' pages for vandalism, as you did with User:Dragons flight/RFA summary, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 14:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Also, please read the message at the top of this page, as it would seem that you are in the process of "MAKING AN ENTIRE SCHOOL DISTRICT SUFFER FROM YOUR SELFISH ACTS". -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 14:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Gwernol 14:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Bill Gates. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 17:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Bill Gates, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 17:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Rocky Mountains (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Rocky Mountains, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 14:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Talk:Rocky Mountains, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 14:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Gwernol 14:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page Illegal immigration on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --StuffOfInterest 12:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cracker (pejorative). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --StuffOfInterest 12:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Spanish-American War (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to New York Tribune, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --StuffOfInterest 14:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, to the rest of my Biology class! ~ Flameviper 14:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] October 2006
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Samurai. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NCurse work 14:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Arabic language, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 14:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
|
|
Ben W Bell talk 16:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] November 2006
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 15:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Kobe Bryant (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 12:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to December 25, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --CalendarWatcher 14:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Terrorism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Your change to the page Ryan was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Waste management (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User:Gwernol. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Fizban30<c.t> 14:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning for editing Football (soccer) (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // AntiVandalBot 14:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 |
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Glen 14:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC) |
