User talk:216.0.191.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Quinwound 13:58, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)

Hello, I have reviewed the edits coming from this IP address, and so far non of them seem constructive. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Solipsist 16:48, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - UtherSRG 14:37, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Zigger 13:24, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 21 October 2005

Testing the system, vandalism, whatever it is -- please stop. –Hajor 18:30, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] January 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Jacksonian democracy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Vary | Talk 04:17, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --Tom Harrison Talk 20:26, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you believe you have been blocked unfairly, please add the text {{unblock}} to this page, along with an explanation of why you believe you were unfairly blocked. An administrator will review your case. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 20:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Sherman's March to the Sea. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- lucasbfr talk 18:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wheelbarrow, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  21:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Battle of Gettysburg, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed as they could be considered to be vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rettetast 13:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Communist party. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rettetast 14:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Alliance '90/The Greens, you will be blocked. Rettetast 14:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hut 8.5 16:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Shyam (T/C) 15:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. If you vandalize Wikipedia once again, as you did to Talk:Valentine's Day, you will be blocked. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 18:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. - Mike Rosoft 19:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Bill Wyatt

Your recent edit to Bill Wyatt (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- GJD 12:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please do not add nonsense to pages and blank pieces of articles like you did to the Yaroslav I the Wise article. If you need someplace to practice editing, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BlindEagle 16:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 2 months as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 16:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)