User talk:213.249.155.239

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 213.249.155.239, is registered to East Midlands Broadband Consortium and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact East Midlands Broadband Consortium to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Archives Archive 1

[edit] 2006

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "I've been Autoblocked. The block message was Extended vandalism despite multiple blocks this year. Please have your network administrator contact me through email to get this IP unblocked sooner. (Full block: No account creation)"

Decline reason: "Please have your network administrator contact the blocking administrator (Zsinj - click here) through email to get this IP unblocked sooner. Daniel .Bryant 10:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

My IP address is: 213.249.155.239 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log)

[edit] 12 January, 06

Hi JJ. Regarding the page John Steinbeck, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. delldot | talk 09:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, or repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV is considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. If you feel that this block is unwarranted, you can add the text {{unblock}} below this message with a brief explanation.
-- Solipsist 13:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for three hours again. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for two hours for more silly edits to Hero of Ukraine. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Yawn... Blocked. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. Benon 02:27, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sceptr e ^(Talk) 13:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you believe you have been blocked unfairly, please add the text {{unblock}} to this page, along with an explanation of why you believe you were unfairly blocked. An administrator will review your case. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- GraemeL ^(talk) 15:41, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Causes of the French Revolution

Thanks for experimenting with the page Causes of the French Revolution on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. —Wayward ^Talk 10:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 14:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit was automatically reverted

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been automatically reverted or removed by a computer program. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel you have recieved this notice in error, please contact contact us at Tawkerbot2's talk page. Thanks Tawkerbot2 14:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Adolf Hitler

Thanks for experimenting with the page Adolf Hitler on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. —Wayward ^Talk 09:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Korean War 15 March 2006

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Donald Albury^(Talk) 12:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 10:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Star network. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Tangotango 10:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to The Black Eyed Peas, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Crumbsucker 12:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 28

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Adolf Hitler. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Alf ^melmac 10:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Chernobyl accident, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 13:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. andy 11:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 11:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 3

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mozambique. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --MrFish 14:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you blank a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T_C (Stollery) 15:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your only warning. Your recent vandalism, such as that you've done to Les Particules Élémentaires, has shown you to be intent on doing harm to Wikipedia. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T_C (Stollery) 08:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Napoleonic Wars was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 09:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 15 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stephenb (Talk) 13:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to X-Men, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kevin 13:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to X-Men. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Havok (T/C/c) 13:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Mountain bike

Your recent edit to Mountain bike was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Alton Towers

Your recent edit to Alton Towers was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 09:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Suvanant Kongying on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 08:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Dalek. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Crazynas 12:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Dalek

Your recent edit to Dalek was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 12:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Johnny squires

Your recent edit to Johnny squires was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 12:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Boeing Yellowstone Project. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T_C (Stollery) 07:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Muslim on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Geneb1955^Talk/_CVU 09:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to J. K. Rowling

Your recent edit to J. K. Rowling was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 08:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 48 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

-- Longhair 08:49, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

I love bacon

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --Yamla 14:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to River Shannon

Your recent edit to River Shannon was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Neil Armstrong on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. David Underdown 10:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Abortion, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Peripitus (Talk) 13:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 month. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Sango 123 18:04, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Sango 123 18:04, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 01:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Alf ^melmac 13:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Alf ^melmac 14:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. --Crossmr 02:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

It seems YOU are acting in an uncivilised, censorous manner. Please follow your own advice and stop these edit wars.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.249.155.239 (talk • contribs).

The edit wars are pushed only be anon editors. We've already covered the fact that this isn't censorship and your continued screaming about it and uncivil behaviour and proxy use doesn't change that fact. --Crossmr 02:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

No, it is your opinion that it isn't censorship. Look at the HipCrime talk page. There are others who think the images should be left in place. You are FORCING your opinion on others, which is censorship and also a violation of the NPOV policy.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.249.155.239 (talk • contribs).

As I said, proxies do not build concensus. The only verifiably independent user who was partially sympathetic to your point of view hasn't responded to the last point made. While there have been several verifiably independent users who've reverted the addition.--Crossmr 03:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

So you say. Seems that BrainDrain disagrees with you, as he is the one who improved the layout/description of the disputed image. On a different topic, anonymous proxies have as much right to edit Wikipedia as anyone else, including you.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.249.155.239 (talk • contribs).

And as he just stated the version I created was within what he proposed as concensus, so no, you do not have concensus for that. Your vandalism of my user page only further indicates what your true purpose here is, and anon-proxies used by the same person do not form a concensus.--Crossmr 03:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Crossmr. It may be seen as vandalism. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- Alf ^melmac 11:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 4th revert

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Crossmr 00:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

How many times have you reverted the article in question? You have violated the three-revert rule repeatedly.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.184.125.133 (talk • contribs).

That only applies to a 24 hour period so no I haven't. Forget which Ip you were signed in with?--Crossmr 01:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. alphaChimp^(talk) 01:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three month block

I have blocked this IP address for three months for vandalism despite multiple lenghty blocks through the past year. This block includes registered users and new account creation. In order to get this IP unblocked before the scheduled expiration date, I would like to recieve an email from the network administrator. A link to my email is accessible on my user page. Thank you. --Zsinj^Talk 03:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/1/3/User_talk%7E213.249.155.239.html"