From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your addition to Jacques Chirac biography, which is "during a visit to a brothel", is as pitiful as a waste of time for the decent contributors and users of wikipedia.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
- Unpopular facts are still facts.
Your change to the page Paintball was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks.
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Temple family ring. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Rklawton 15:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
You have been
blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for
vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.
Netsnipe ► 13:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "company address, many many users is here"
Decline reason: "If this is a company address, ask your IT department to reprimand the vandal in question and then email <unblock-en-l at mail.wikimedia.org>. Otherwise you can forget about any of us believing you since we hear these sorts of lies on a regular basis. -- Netsnipe ► 13:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Not thank you. I work IT department. Over 2000 users, we cant tell who. It is rude for you to say lies. English word for you kind is asshole?
Please see WP:NPA. Calling people that word on Wikipedia is NOT the best way to get unblocked! [[User:Nwwaew|Nwwaew]] 20:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked for
trolling for a period of
3 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your
talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from
this list.
Luna Santin 08:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Soft block; please log in to edit. Luna Santin 08:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "personal attack. You dont like my opinion on a talk page which is controvercial so you block me? Policy says "Blocks for gross incivility are controversial; "cool-down" blocks are very controversial. Consider whether a 1-hour block will result in 2 months' drama. See Wikipedia:Disruptive editing." Luna Santin or so called CVU said Trolling. No policy for Trolling at all, Luna Santin has personal problem about this? Cant talk on his page because of block."
Decline reason: "Actually there is. It's called Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. I agree with you that the whole point of having CVU when in reality it's just a disorganised mob calling themselves a "unit" is a bit of a provocative farce. But what you've done is tantamount to poking a beehive and wondering why you're getting stung. Therefore I don't have any sympathy for your situation and shall uphold your block. If you want to voice genuine opinions over controversial matters, you need to stand by them with an identity, not a disembodied IP address that you've previously claim is shared by 2000 people at the same company. -- Netsnipe ► 09:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
I'm not the person here from IT above. None of those guys are native speakers of English, I see why he might have got upset at you calling him a liar though. Guess I should try and setup an account or something.
trying to follow all the rules, want to make username blocked by Glen S, insulted by Netsnipe, is there any helpful administrators any more? Please?
- It appears that you are autoblocked because someone utilizing your IP has been blocked for an inappropriate username. If you could provide the username that was blocked, we can assist you further (using {{unblock-auto}} to convey this to us would also suffice).—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 |
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Autoblock of 211.10.18.77 lifted or expired.
Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 14:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
|
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.
[IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]
|
