User talk:209.177.21.6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user thinks that registration should be required to edit articles.

Just thought that the irony would be amusing.

Contents

[edit] Blanking your user page

I want to mention that it is highly improper to blank your own user talk page as the blanking removed warnings and a block log from the page you can see WP:VAND, but more importantly.... MrMacMan 22:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copy Violation of GN Village school article

I feel awful already...Why make it worse? Why can't I have a clean slate? I promise i won't do anything without discussing first....the village school is copy violation...so don't accuse me of vandalism. User: 209.177.21.6

If you feel the article is a copy violation, then use the talk page and explain your claim. I don't see anything that isn't already in quotes that was taken from the village school site, if such copying does exist then point it out on the talk page, BUT -- this is a ongoing issue and your claim that the article is a copy violation have been reverted in the past your deletion of material and the revert by a 3rd party. I was about to give you your 4th vandalism warning and am still leaning towards it -- just use the talk page to clearly express why and where the article is copied from and I will obviously not warn you again. MrMacMan 00:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning: Vandalism on Smile. using TW

[edit] March 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Smile, you will be blocked from editing. This is an automated notice by Groupempty. If you have any questions/comments, please go to my talk page. Thank you! 01:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice
I believe this last warning notice was improper, as the user only made one change in image to Smile and it was not WP:VAND. I request Groupempty explain the notice and why this is clear vandalism. MrMacMan 02:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!

Thank you!!!! I promise from now on, I will be a faithful editor. I will discuss my changes in the talk page from now on. (209.177.21.6)

As you have been warned before, you cannot blank your talk page; users need to see the warnings and blocks you have had. --www.secularism.org.uk 19:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Great Neck Village School, you will be blocked from editing. James, La gloria è a dio 21:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Great Neck Village School, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 1312020Wikicop 21:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

[edit] Re:Blanking user talk page

Blanking the user talk page of warnings is frowned upon, especially for anonymous accounts, and especially for recent posts. It gives the impression that you are trying to hide something. Better to respond to the warning if you think it's unfair.

If you would like to be able to archive long or cumbersome talk pages, I suggest you create an account so that you can create the appropriate subpages. ... discospinster talk 19:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion comment

Comments on discussion pages are remarks made by individuals. How dare you edit MY comment, wrong or not! It is signed with my name and is clearly from me you have no write to edit a users comments. --Brideshead 19:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)