User talk:208.39.151.150

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Attention:

This IP address, 208.39.151.150, is registered to Centennial School District and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Centennial School District to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

THE CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT HAS NO CONTROL OVER THIS. BLAME THE KIDS. Welcome!

Hello, 208.39.151.150, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Thanks for editing the inappropriate and tasteles sentence from Downs syndrome Pedant 14:59, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Tεx τ urε 16:38, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edward 20:10, 2005 Mar 2 (UTC)

Do not vandalize or you will be prevented from editing. Lupo 15:33, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edward 22:13, 2005 Mar 3 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. andy 15:52, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

--ElTyrant 16:05, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism and Blasphemy

===>Could you please stop both? Thanks. Justin (koavf) 14:02, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

Once upon a time in a land far far away there was an IP. Now, this was a bad land where they teach IPs to be sub-human. So, one day the IP came to the real world and no one liked him. It was kind of sad :(. Why you might ask? Why? because it was sub-human. The End. gren 14:32, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I asked for block on you. Pavel Vozenilek 22:21, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 3 days. Thue | talk 12:12, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] You wrote on my Talk page

===>Several issues: Let me quote you, and then respond.

Excuse me, but you can not accuse someone of blasphemy. Wikipedia is an equal oppurtunity source of information, with no religious bias' [sic].

I certainly can accuse someone of blasphemy. In fact, I did. The idea that you, a person writing from an anonymous IP who has apparently been blocked several times, are telling me what Wikipedia policy is is ridiculous. I've made my personal identity and contact information public knowledge and made a screen name to hold myself accountable for the information that I put on the Internet. Since Wikipedia is "an equal opportunity source of information, with no religious bias," by your own reasoning, blasphemy would not be permitted, as it is inherently a religious bias.

Thusly, you can not say that I am blaspheming against Christianity, since I do not believe in any aspects of the Bible.

From the article on blasphemy: "blasphemy is the defamation of the name of God or the gods, and by extension any display of gross irreverence towards any person or thing deemed worthy of exalted esteem." That definition has nothing to do with one's personal beliefs and convictions. Regardless of whether or not you are a Christian, you still wrote blasphemous statements.

Blasphemy can only be accused if the case has to do with the Christian religion. Since Wikipedia deals with all religions from a factual and un-biased view, you can not use the idea of blasphemy. I am not denying the vandalism, due in fact that this is a shared IP and that many people use it. I am merely stating that you can not accuse any user of blasphemy since it is a religious accusation.

What are you talking about? How can blasphemy only be accused if it has to do with Christianity? What does "you can not use the idea of blasphemy" even mean? This is unintelligible. Moreover, if you don't want to be held accountable for others' vandalism, I suggest you make a free screen name - it takes about 30 seconds.

That would be like you editing pages on Islam or Hinduism stating that they believe in false prophets.

This directly contradicts what you just said. ("Blasphemy can only be accused if the case has to do with the Christian religion.") I also do not write things like that in articles precisely because they are blasphemous. Your analogy is irrelevant anyway, since I put the comment about blasphemy on your Talk page, rather than an article - it was a message directed to you, instead of what is intended to be public knowledge.

As you can see, your accusations against me are baseless and unwarranted. Furhtermore, the insertion of your critique inside another user's comments isn't helpful - if you feel the need to write on my Talk page, please create a new comment. Justin (koavf) 14:46, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] My Talk page, again

===>What?

I have no clue what you're talking about.

How so? I defended myself. At this point, you're just being inflammatory. And since I've posted on your Talk page, you've vandalized two articles again.

Anyway, all factual information points to the idea that God is, well, non-existant. Thus, blasphemy is an intangible argument.

This is also asinine. You can tell the "factual information" to all of the people far more intelligent than you who are theists. Such as Einstein, Kant, Socrates, and thousands of other brilliant people throughout human history. Since there is disagreement on the matter, I don't see how you can possibly claim, with any degree of intellectually honest that, well, God must be non-existant. Why? Becuase you say so, and you're right. Plus, you also claimed that I could be blasphemous ("...editing pages on Islam or Hinduism stating that they believe in false prophets..."), but now you're saying it's not possible. Your argument is self-contradictory and pointless.

My personal beliefs, as right as they are, are, well, right. Blasphemy, as you said, is 'defamation of the name of God or the gods.' You can't defame that which does not exist. Well, you can, which I guess is what you think I did, but I merely shed light on the subject.

One more time, you've directly contradicted yourself in the span of a few sentences, and proven that you have nothing meaningful or intelligible to say. Now that you've displayed your own atheism, it makes it clear that your edits on pages relating to God and Christ are obviously biased, POV, and in direction contravention to both Wikipedia policy, and the rules by which you accuse me ("Wikipedia is an equal oppurtunity source of information, with no religious bias' [sic]"). Why would you do juvenile things like this? It's not at all helpful to anyone. The more outrageous claim is that you're "shed[ding] light on the subject." How? By inserting anti-Christian propaganda in the article about Jesus' names and titles? If you want to be a jackass, feel free to do it on a message board. Wikipedia is for learning and fact. Justin (koavf) 00:08, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

OK. Enough vandalism already. Go do something constructive. Everyking 12:53, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Well, all right, have fun. Everyking 12:56, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Shanes 12:52, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalizing (June 2005)

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.drini ☎ 17:43, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.drini ☎ 17:48, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 23 September 2005

[edit] 26 October 2005

Your edit to the article on the French language was inappropriate. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mamawrit es ^{& listens} 18:27, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] November 1

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Jfurr1981 20:56, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] November 2

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --pgk^(talk) 17:49, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If when the block expires you continue vandalising Wikipedia this account could face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses this account. Lectonar 14:41, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] December '05

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 18:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of a month. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Joann e B 18:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Also, please sign your posts on talkpages by typing --~~~~ (FromTheDoctor10 (talk|email) 18:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC))

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Latinus 17:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Latinus 17:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Febraury 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Abraham Lincoln. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. PJM 15:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. pgk^(talk) 18:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to The Star-Spangled Banner

Thanks for experimenting with the page The Star-Spangled Banner on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. —Wayward ^Talk 13:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Star-Spangled Banner. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —Wayward ^Talk 13:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

OK, if you could please stop that. Everyking 13:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 16:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 16:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 06

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed undone by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 16:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop deliberately introducing incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RexNL 18:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

RexNL 18:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Harriet Tubman was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing Elias Howe. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Tawkerbot2 16:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 17:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Hawaii: Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. colorprobe ^{·Talk ·Contribs ·@} _RCP 13:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Abraham Lincoln. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Alf ^melmac 18:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Napoleon III of France, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Alf ^melmac 18:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Attack on Pearl Harbor on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 13:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to School bus

Your recent edit to School bus was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Gays, Illinois, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Mwanner | Talk 17:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against persistent vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

Radio Kirk talk to me 18:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Halo 3. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Jeff Dugan

Your recent edit to Jeff Dugan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jeff Dugan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 18:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Layup

Your recent edit to Layup (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: bv

[edit] Regarding edits made during September 13, 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 12:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Winston Churchill. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alex ^{(talk here)} 13:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Winston Churchill. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alex ^{(talk here)} 13:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Scientific method

Your recent edit to Scientific method (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Harry S. Truman High School

Thank you for experimenting with the page Harry S. Truman High School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. RichBerry 13:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Your recent edit to Obsessive-compulsive disorder (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Penguin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 12:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Marine corps. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NCurs e _work 13:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Alphachimp 17:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Your school has been blocked until September 2007. If this presents some issue, please contact me. Otherwise, enjoy the yearlong break from editing. Alphachimp 17:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/0/8/User_talk%7E208.39.151.150.html"

Categories: IP addresses used for vandalism | Shared IP addresses