From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] "Edit warring to insert defamatory text"
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "Complete and utter crap! It is NOT defamatory because it is true and provable. References were cited proving all statements to be true. The references quote the subject both directly and indirectly as quoted in a newspaper interview he gave. Removing verified and factual information is censorship. The Railpage members removing it are the page vandals. None of the organised group of Railpage members trying to censor the article gave one reference supporting their outrageous claims. Wikipedia ought to be ashamed of itself for swallowing the rubbish being fed to the discussion by Railpage."
Decline reason: "Clear edit warring. No evidence of any attempt by you on the article's talk page to reach a consensus. Please also see WP:RS. Sandstein, you are welcome to override my decision if you or the blocking admin believe it appropriate to do so. — Yamla 17:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
- Please stand by as I evaluate the situation and, if necessary, contact the blocking admin. Sandstein 17:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Yamla. You are not blocked for the content, which I couldn't care less about. You are blocked for edit warring. Incidentally, the website appears to be non-notable anyway; I'm going to nominate the article for deletion. Sandstein 17:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Remove "to insert defamatory text". This is itself defamatory. The Railpage members are the ones doing the edit warring by removing true and provable content backed up by references. They should be blocked for edit warring and censorship. 208.113.160.21 03:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.
[IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]
|
